Tools & Wizards About Us
lscore.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

lscore.net

LiveScore on LScore - Live Sports Scores

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

366 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

153 ms

lscore.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lscore.net homepage info - get ready to check LScore best content right away, or after learning these important things about lscore.net

Livescore, here you can find the results of most sports with over 1000 leagues. Livescore, results, standings, fixtures and match details.

Visit lscore.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lscore.net page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lscore.net performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value37,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lscore.net

366 ms

bootstrap.min.css

175 ms

animate.css

189 ms

icofont.min.css

271 ms

swiper.min.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Lscore.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Es-djs.enetscores.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Widget.enetscores.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Lscore.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

262.2 kB

After Optimization

224.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lscore.net main page is 262.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 173.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 16.3 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LScore needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 63.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 173.2 kB
  • After minification 173.2 kB
  • After compression 156.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lscore.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (62%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LScore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lscore.net

lscore.net

366 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

175 ms

animate.css

animate.css

189 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

271 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

193 ms

lightcase.css

lightcase.css

186 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

275 ms

FWACE31A68D4711A89

FWACE31A68D4711A89

128 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

348 ms

modernizr-3.11.2.min.js

modernizr-3.11.2.min.js

285 ms

circularProgressBar.min.js

circularProgressBar.min.js

284 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

286 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

539 ms

lightcase.js

lightcase.js

404 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

405 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

405 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

407 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

446 ms

main.js

main.js

467 ms

body-shape.webp

body-shape.webp

1486 ms

lscorelogo.webp

lscorelogo.webp

479 ms

css2

css2

28 ms

style.css

style.css

55 ms

FWACE31A68D4711A89

FWACE31A68D4711A89

309 ms

FWACE31A68D4711A89

FWACE31A68D4711A89

354 ms

migratorydata-client.js

migratorydata-client.js

257 ms

livescore.min.js

livescore.min.js

94 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

181 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

224 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

248 ms

magicred.webp

magicred.webp

258 ms

europa-casino-jackpot.webp

europa-casino-jackpot.webp

273 ms

casino-winner.webp

casino-winner.webp

321 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

307 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

111 ms

lscorelogo.webp

lscorelogo.webp

117 ms

magicred.webp

magicred.webp

110 ms

europa-casino-jackpot.webp

europa-casino-jackpot.webp

108 ms

casino-winner.webp

casino-winner.webp

112 ms

Accessibility Review

lscore.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lscore.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lscore.net SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lscore.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lscore.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lscore.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LScore. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: