Tools & Wizards About Us
ltce.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

ltce.in

Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering | LTCE- Navi Mumbai

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

640 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

400 ms

ltce.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ltce.in homepage info - get ready to check LTCE best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ltce.in

Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Sector 4, Vikas Nagar, Koparkhairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA, 400709

Visit ltce.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ltce.in page load time and found that the first response time was 640 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ltce.in performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.405

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ltce.in

640 ms

ltce.in

1232 ms

reset.css

555 ms

fonts.css

558 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1173 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Ltce.in, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ltce.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 721.1 kB (25%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ltce.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 57.7 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LTCE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 290.6 kB

  • Original 436.5 kB
  • After minification 424.3 kB
  • After compression 145.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 351.4 kB

  • Original 407.0 kB
  • After minification 344.6 kB
  • After compression 55.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltce.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 351.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LTCE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ltce.in

ltce.in

640 ms

ltce.in

ltce.in

1232 ms

reset.css

reset.css

555 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

558 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1173 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

784 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

598 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

630 ms

iconmoon.css

iconmoon.css

739 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

743 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1001 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1465 ms

logo.png

logo.png

912 ms

logo-b.png

logo-b.png

1101 ms

ltjss.jpg

ltjss.jpg

785 ms

autonomus24.jpg

autonomus24.jpg

1045 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

23 ms

close-icon.png

close-icon.png

1019 ms

Autonomus2024.jpg

Autonomus2024.jpg

1833 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1199 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1023 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

1242 ms

matchHeight-min.js

matchHeight-min.js

1087 ms

bxslider.min.js

bxslider.min.js

1241 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1280 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

1275 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

1367 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

1428 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1433 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

1461 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1488 ms

css

css

28 ms

yt.png

yt.png

647 ms

ltce-logo-tr.png

ltce-logo-tr.png

517 ms

icr-mir.png

icr-mir.png

520 ms

certification-ico.png

certification-ico.png

535 ms

right-arrow-37.png

right-arrow-37.png

586 ms

new.gif

new.gif

721 ms

about-video1.jpg

about-video1.jpg

705 ms

play-btn.png

play-btn.png

717 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

721 ms

naac-a.jpg

naac-a.jpg

757 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

802 ms

slide44.jpg

slide44.jpg

849 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

1469 ms

about-bg.jpg

about-bg.jpg

892 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

58 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1060 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

966 ms

texgyreadventor-bold-webfont.woff

texgyreadventor-bold-webfont.woff

995 ms

texgyreadventor-regular-webfont.woff

texgyreadventor-regular-webfont.woff

994 ms

Accessibility Review

ltce.in accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ltce.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ltce.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltce.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ltce.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ltce.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LTCE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: