4.7 sec in total
843 ms
3.4 sec
476 ms
Welcome to ltool.net homepage info - get ready to check Ltool best content for South Korea right away, or after learning these important things about ltool.net
You can make your own real English name. / You can make your own real Japanese name. / Change Simplified Chinese Characters to Traditional
Visit ltool.netWe analyzed Ltool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 843 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ltool.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.174
69/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
843 ms
614 ms
616 ms
19 ms
411 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Ltool.net, 11% (9 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ltool.net.
Page size can be reduced by 327.1 kB (49%)
674.2 kB
347.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ltool.net main page is 674.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 299.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 844 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ltool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 141.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)
80
37
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ltool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ltool.net
843 ms
javascript.js
614 ms
origin_style.css
616 ms
adsbygoogle.js
19 ms
share_ad.css
411 ms
allfreeimages.css
412 ms
cssgenerators.css
1056 ms
ipipipip.css
469 ms
ca-pub-8085837453460834.js
167 ms
zrt_lookup.html
160 ms
show_ads_impl.js
78 ms
allfreeimages_en.gif
655 ms
main_01.gif
440 ms
main_02.gif
440 ms
main_03.gif
454 ms
main_04.gif
474 ms
main_05.gif
811 ms
main_06.gif
853 ms
main_07.gif
875 ms
main_08.gif
883 ms
main_09.gif
886 ms
main_10.gif
1029 ms
main_11.gif
1222 ms
main_12.gif
1248 ms
main_13.gif
1289 ms
main_14.gif
1298 ms
main_15.gif
1295 ms
main_16.gif
1436 ms
main_17.gif
1635 ms
main_18.gif
1673 ms
main_19.gif
1704 ms
main_20.gif
1703 ms
main_21.gif
1724 ms
main_22.gif
1845 ms
main_23.gif
2060 ms
main_24.gif
2106 ms
gpt.js
65 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
82 ms
ads
501 ms
osd.js
35 ms
ads
77 ms
container.html
37 ms
ads
354 ms
ads
334 ms
ads.js
7 ms
adcore.js
3 ms
adcore_pc.js
4 ms
adcore_pc_inline.js
3 ms
ad_spot.aspx
385 ms
widgets.js
4 ms
ga.js
34 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
38 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
48 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
syndication
169 ms
565685629330395136
176 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.th.html
22 ms
10046890138601192171
28 ms
abg.js
29 ms
m_js_controller.js
48 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
113 ms
10359808719890196374
77 ms
s
64 ms
x_button_blue2.png
59 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
15 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
21 ms
style.css
183 ms
ad_creative.ashx
367 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
7 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
67 ms
LIdunTW5_normal.jpg
81 ms
4277764a2d2f2cbf224e53a83d163fad_normal.jpeg
39 ms
uUArY2Rf_normal.png
42 ms
EqbRp993_normal.jpg
76 ms
ie25x1gG_normal.jpg
39 ms
RestoreXidToMediaStorage.html
7 ms
jot.html
2 ms
activeview
25 ms
activeview
44 ms
activeview
42 ms
activeview
25 ms
ltool.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ltool.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ltool.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
TH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Thai language. Our system also found out that Ltool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ltool.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ltool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: