Tools & Wizards About Us
lucentree.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lucentree.com

Progressive Tribal Governance & Spiritual Wellness

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

348 ms

lucentree.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lucentree.com homepage info - get ready to check Lucentree best content right away, or after learning these important things about lucentree.com

We're Progressive Tribal Governance & Spiritual Wellness Consultants. Our methods are forward thinking, mindful, and practical. Let's Talk!

Visit lucentree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lucentree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lucentree.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lucentree.com

96 ms

lucentree.com

67 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

85 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

95 ms

style.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Lucentree.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) belongs to the original domain Lucentree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 322.4 kB (52%)

Content Size

620.4 kB

After Optimization

298.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lucentree.com main page is 620.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 369.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 321.2 kB

  • Original 369.0 kB
  • After minification 363.2 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 321.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 4.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lucentree images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 245 B

  • Original 164.8 kB
  • After minification 164.8 kB
  • After compression 164.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 946 B

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 81.5 kB
  • After compression 81.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lucentree.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (91%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lucentree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lucentree.com

lucentree.com

96 ms

lucentree.com

lucentree.com

67 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

85 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

95 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

33 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

116 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

96 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

69 ms

css

css

54 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

78 ms

tooltipster-borderless.min.css

tooltipster-borderless.min.css

339 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

91 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

style-new.min.css

style-new.min.css

341 ms

pagecount.min.js

pagecount.min.js

339 ms

flex-public.min.js

flex-public.min.js

100 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

341 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

332 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

341 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

333 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

333 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

334 ms

featherlight.min.js

featherlight.min.js

336 ms

jstz.min.js

jstz.min.js

340 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

337 ms

targeting.min.js

targeting.min.js

341 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

50 ms

css

css

16 ms

HKGrotesk-SemiBold.woff

HKGrotesk-SemiBold.woff

498 ms

HKGrotesk-Regular.woff

HKGrotesk-Regular.woff

610 ms

HKGrotesk-Medium.woff

HKGrotesk-Medium.woff

595 ms

HKGrotesk-Light.woff

HKGrotesk-Light.woff

608 ms

HKGrotesk-Bold.woff

HKGrotesk-Bold.woff

610 ms

9Btx3DZF0dXLMZlywRbVRNhxy2LscnM.woff

9Btx3DZF0dXLMZlywRbVRNhxy2LscnM.woff

339 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

299 ms

no-image.jpg

no-image.jpg

360 ms

flo-instagram-public.css

flo-instagram-public.css

82 ms

vendor.css

vendor.css

81 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

flo-forms-public.min.css

flo-forms-public.min.css

112 ms

Accessibility Review

lucentree.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lucentree.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lucentree.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lucentree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lucentree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lucentree.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: