2.1 sec in total
111 ms
1.7 sec
320 ms
Visit lucepictor.com now to see the best up-to-date Lucepictor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lucepictor.com
Product and advertising photography studio offers full range of creative product photography services to clients in all European markets and beyond.
Visit lucepictor.comWe analyzed Lucepictor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lucepictor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
20/100
10%
111 ms
243 ms
171 ms
17 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Lucepictor.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Images.lucepictor.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (776 ms) relates to the external source Stats.upressme.xyz.
Page size can be reduced by 73.4 kB (4%)
1.9 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Lucepictor.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lucepictor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (83%)
66
11
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lucepictor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lucepictor.com
111 ms
www.lucepictor.com
243 ms
gtm.js
171 ms
classic-themes.min.css
17 ms
style.css
27 ms
style.css
24 ms
masterslider.main.css
36 ms
custom.css
44 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
42 ms
custom-frontend-legacy.min.css
45 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
49 ms
font-awesome.min.css
45 ms
frontend.min.css
58 ms
post-6444.css
55 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
84 ms
all.min.css
102 ms
v4-shims.min.css
110 ms
flatpickr.min.css
108 ms
global.css
111 ms
post-4727.css
115 ms
post-4733.css
113 ms
post-4724.css
120 ms
fontawesome.min.css
115 ms
brands.min.css
117 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
elementor-widgets.js
152 ms
utils.min.js
152 ms
v4-shims.min.js
152 ms
animations.min.css
153 ms
wc-quick-view.js
162 ms
underscore.min.js
163 ms
frontend.min.js
174 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
163 ms
url-polyfill.min.js
164 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
164 ms
masterslider.min.js
166 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
165 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
164 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
163 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
157 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
150 ms
hooks.min.js
140 ms
i18n.min.js
141 ms
frontend.min.js
137 ms
waypoints.min.js
285 ms
core.min.js
282 ms
swiper.min.js
279 ms
share-link.min.js
289 ms
dialog.min.js
285 ms
frontend.min.js
240 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
268 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
265 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
265 ms
wp-util.min.js
264 ms
frontend.min.js
265 ms
flatpickr.min.js
263 ms
lazyload.min.js
278 ms
logo-main-dark.png
292 ms
matomo.js
776 ms
logo-dark-250x250.png
297 ms
blank.gif
280 ms
ice-splash-product-photo.jpg
141 ms
headphone-product-photography.jpg
131 ms
sports-shoes-advertising-photography-slider.jpg
130 ms
cosmetics-advertising-ecommerce-photography.jpg
132 ms
cosmetics-advertising-photography.jpg
126 ms
loading-2.gif
374 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
253 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
174 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
162 ms
picturefill.min.js
149 ms
lucepictor.com accessibility score
lucepictor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lucepictor.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lucepictor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lucepictor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lucepictor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lucepictor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: