Tools & Wizards About Us
lufop.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

lufop.net

Radars automatiques en France Belgique Suisse et en Europe pour votre GPS

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

510 ms

lufop.net screenshot

About Website

Visit lufop.net now to see the best up-to-date Lufop content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lufop.net

Lufop.net permet de télécharger gratuitement des Radars, Zones de Danger et autres POIs pour GPS et Applications mobiles. La base de données la plus à jour et gratuite pour prendre la route

Visit lufop.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lufop.net page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lufop.net performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,730 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lufop.net

180 ms

lufop.net

416 ms

26wre.js

80 ms

26wre.css

159 ms

26wre.css

316 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Lufop.net, 10% (10 requests) were made to Platform-lookaside.fbsbx.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (802 ms) relates to the external source Platform-lookaside.fbsbx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

888.3 kB

After Optimization

803.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lufop.net main page is 888.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 517.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 77.5 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 263.3 kB
  • After minification 245.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lufop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 517.5 kB
  • After minification 517.5 kB
  • After compression 515.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 806 B

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lufop.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (73%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lufop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lufop.net

lufop.net

180 ms

lufop.net

lufop.net

416 ms

26wre.js

26wre.js

80 ms

26wre.css

26wre.css

159 ms

26wre.css

26wre.css

316 ms

26wre.css

26wre.css

238 ms

js

js

89 ms

26wre.css

26wre.css

238 ms

26wre.js

26wre.js

320 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

26wre.js

26wre.js

339 ms

api.js

api.js

49 ms

26wre.js

26wre.js

351 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

179 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

45 ms

26x3o.css

26x3o.css

318 ms

index.js

index.js

318 ms

index.js

index.js

441 ms

loader.js

loader.js

38 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

579 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

112 ms

80x15.png

80x15.png

185 ms

carbon.png

carbon.png

165 ms

header_shadow_right.png

header_shadow_right.png

164 ms

header_shadow.png

header_shadow.png

165 ms

feed-icon-16x16.gif

feed-icon-16x16.gif

164 ms

search.png

search.png

163 ms

header_v5.jpg

header_v5.jpg

231 ms

black-60.png

black-60.png

234 ms

first_menu.png

first_menu.png

233 ms

menu_end.png

menu_end.png

233 ms

shadow_right.png

shadow_right.png

232 ms

shadow_left.png

shadow_left.png

245 ms

radar_tourelle.jpg

radar_tourelle.jpg

306 ms

13.png

13.png

302 ms

58.png

58.png

305 ms

57.png

57.png

304 ms

new.gif

new.gif

303 ms

need-you.jpg

need-you.jpg

328 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

380 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

382 ms

tweeter.png

tweeter.png

459 ms

FR.png

FR.png

380 ms

BE.png

BE.png

381 ms

IT.png

IT.png

411 ms

DE.png

DE.png

457 ms

CH.png

CH.png

459 ms

ES.png

ES.png

458 ms

IR.png

IR.png

460 ms

SE.png

SE.png

494 ms

PT.png

PT.png

534 ms

NL.png

NL.png

536 ms

LU.png

LU.png

535 ms

GB.png

GB.png

535 ms

PL.png

PL.png

536 ms

AD.png

AD.png

577 ms

LV.png

LV.png

596 ms

622 ms

CZ.png

CZ.png

457 ms

BG.png

BG.png

457 ms

CA.png

CA.png

457 ms

AU.png

AU.png

505 ms

f.svg

f.svg

5 ms

NZ.png

NZ.png

517 ms

icon.svg

icon.svg

20 ms

80x15.png

80x15.png

76 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

17 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

57 ms

NO.png

NO.png

466 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

545 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

467 ms

code_bg.png

code_bg.png

521 ms

box-shadow.png

box-shadow.png

540 ms

footer_shadow_right.png

footer_shadow_right.png

532 ms

footer_shadow.png

footer_shadow.png

474 ms

145 ms

77 ms

197 ms

73 ms

70 ms

802 ms

68 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

133 ms

68 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

169 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

138 ms

favoris.js

favoris.js

151 ms

myjs_non_mobile.js

myjs_non_mobile.js

155 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

37 ms

leaflet

leaflet

64 ms

mycssperso.css

mycssperso.css

155 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

13 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

155 ms

js

js

66 ms

61 ms

crosshair.gif

crosshair.gif

79 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

115 ms

108 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

10 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

17 ms

Accessibility Review

lufop.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

lufop.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lufop.net SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lufop.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lufop.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lufop.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lufop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: