Tools & Wizards About Us
luggagebase.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

luggagebase.com

Luggage Sets, Carry-On Travel Bags, & Backpacks | Eagle Creek Luggage, Samsonite, & More - LuggageBase

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

641 ms

luggagebase.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to luggagebase.com homepage info - get ready to check Luggage Base best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about luggagebase.com

Buy travel luggage, carry on bags, backpacks, briefcases, duffels, and more! Browse our wide selection of high-quality luggage from all of the top brands including Eagle Creek, Samsonite, Osprey, Pata...

Visit luggagebase.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luggagebase.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luggagebase.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,600 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luggagebase.com

51 ms

luggagebase.com

239 ms

www.luggagebase.com

589 ms

gtm.js

119 ms

all.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Luggagebase.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Image.providesupport.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) belongs to the original domain Luggagebase.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 314.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luggagebase.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 83.5 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 72.1 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 187.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Luggage Base needs image optimization as it can save up to 187.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 488.4 kB
  • After minification 485.7 kB
  • After compression 445.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 215 B

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 62.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luggagebase.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (26%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

69

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luggage Base. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luggagebase.com

luggagebase.com

51 ms

luggagebase.com

luggagebase.com

239 ms

www.luggagebase.com

www.luggagebase.com

589 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

119 ms

all.css

all.css

35 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.js

modernizr-2.8.3.js

72 ms

api.js

api.js

69 ms

seal.js

seal.js

154 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

jRespond.min.js

jRespond.min.js

47 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

47 ms

adally.js

adally.js

11 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

63 ms

onveos-paypal.js

onveos-paypal.js

60 ms

AjaxPager.js

AjaxPager.js

59 ms

embed.js

embed.js

52 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

240 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

255 ms

raygun.min.js

raygun.min.js

256 ms

logox2.png

logox2.png

220 ms

DESKTOP-travepro-maxlite5.jpg

DESKTOP-travepro-maxlite5.jpg

237 ms

carryone-best-sellers.jpg

carryone-best-sellers.jpg

331 ms

image

image

307 ms

image

image

308 ms

image

image

307 ms

image

image

311 ms

image

image

313 ms

image

image

359 ms

image

image

365 ms

image

image

505 ms

image

image

502 ms

image

image

503 ms

image

image

534 ms

image

image

505 ms

image

image

507 ms

image

image

507 ms

image

image

508 ms

image

image

509 ms

image

image

510 ms

image

image

511 ms

image

image

526 ms

image

image

527 ms

image

image

532 ms

image

image

535 ms

image

image

567 ms

image

image

566 ms

image

image

577 ms

image

image

588 ms

image

image

609 ms

image

image

629 ms

image

image

675 ms

image

image

626 ms

image

image

641 ms

image

image

652 ms

safe-textlink.js

safe-textlink.js

354 ms

image

image

668 ms

all.js

all.js

242 ms

secure90x72.gif

secure90x72.gif

104 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

worksans-regular-webfont.woff

worksans-regular-webfont.woff

610 ms

worksans-medium-webfont.woff

worksans-medium-webfont.woff

654 ms

worksans-bold-webfont.woff

worksans-bold-webfont.woff

606 ms

worksans-light-webfont.woff

worksans-light-webfont.woff

413 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

js

js

56 ms

numans-regular-webfont.woff

numans-regular-webfont.woff

434 ms

image

image

485 ms

all.js

all.js

14 ms

image

image

472 ms

image

image

483 ms

image

image

496 ms

static.js

static.js

141 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

140 ms

image

image

567 ms

image

image

398 ms

image

image

409 ms

image

image

427 ms

image

image

443 ms

image

image

452 ms

image

image

469 ms

image

image

456 ms

image

image

477 ms

image

image

487 ms

classicBanner.min.js

classicBanner.min.js

28 ms

image

image

494 ms

image

image

499 ms

image

image

508 ms

image

image

507 ms

image

image

543 ms

image

image

527 ms

11qftwak9cwfo1689l4tditwnu

11qftwak9cwfo1689l4tditwnu

44 ms

image

image

520 ms

image

image

537 ms

image

image

537 ms

home-content-bg.png

home-content-bg.png

466 ms

blog-info-bg.jpg

blog-info-bg.jpg

455 ms

logo.png

logo.png

450 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

605 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

444 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

437 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

429 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

441 ms

Accessibility Review

luggagebase.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

luggagebase.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

luggagebase.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luggagebase.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luggagebase.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luggagebase.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luggage Base. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: