Tools & Wizards About Us
lughet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lughet.com

Lughet

Page Load Speed

435 ms in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

345 ms

Page Rendered

68 ms

lughet.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lughet.com homepage info - get ready to check Lughet best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about lughet.com

Lughet

Visit lughet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lughet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 413 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lughet.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lughet.com

22 ms

lughet.com

45 ms

application-26f6d5559771f2123dc19d909d8b4d9eb950a18163e90a42c08b47b90882ed9b.css

17 ms

application-20a57b359f39cea60bf3c0b3b5d10015afa3309f8a5eaa9542d8b1f04eedd729.js

96 ms

api.js

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Lughet.com, 9% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (78%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

308.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lughet.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 705.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 16.1 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 331 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 984 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lughet needs image optimization as it can save up to 331 B or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 470.0 kB

  • Original 667.8 kB
  • After minification 667.8 kB
  • After compression 197.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 600.1 kB

  • Original 705.2 kB
  • After minification 702.7 kB
  • After compression 105.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lughet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 600.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lughet. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

lughet.com

lughet.com

22 ms

lughet.com

lughet.com

45 ms

application-26f6d5559771f2123dc19d909d8b4d9eb950a18163e90a42c08b47b90882ed9b.css

application-26f6d5559771f2123dc19d909d8b4d9eb950a18163e90a42c08b47b90882ed9b.css

17 ms

application-20a57b359f39cea60bf3c0b3b5d10015afa3309f8a5eaa9542d8b1f04eedd729.js

application-20a57b359f39cea60bf3c0b3b5d10015afa3309f8a5eaa9542d8b1f04eedd729.js

96 ms

api.js

api.js

256 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

2 ms

stats.json

stats.json

58 ms

icon2-8541c2229a7d1b1cb4cd9bcc11e38909518aefeba01a7702eb36ca79abb1652f.png

icon2-8541c2229a7d1b1cb4cd9bcc11e38909518aefeba01a7702eb36ca79abb1652f.png

10 ms

OpenSans-400.woff

OpenSans-400.woff

11 ms

OpenSans-300.woff

OpenSans-300.woff

11 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

12 ms

Accessibility Review

lughet.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lughet.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lughet.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lughet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lughet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lughet.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lughet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: