Tools & Wizards About Us
lugripper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

lugripper.com

Lug Ripper

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

984 ms

Page Rendered

119 ms

lugripper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lugripper.com homepage info - get ready to check Lug Ripper best content right away, or after learning these important things about lugripper.com

Visit lugripper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lugripper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lugripper.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lugripper.com

146 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

33 ms

style.min.css

124 ms

style.css

103 ms

wp-embed.min.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Lugripper.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Static.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) belongs to the original domain Lugripper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

592.4 kB

After Optimization

543.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lugripper.com main page is 592.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 302.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 11.8 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 302.0 kB
  • After minification 299.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lug Ripper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 174.1 kB
  • After minification 174.1 kB
  • After compression 171.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 104.6 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB
  • After compression 68.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lugripper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lug Ripper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lugripper.com

www.lugripper.com

146 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

124 ms

style.css

style.css

103 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

63 ms

UJ0M6R577Vs

UJ0M6R577Vs

115 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

320 ms

top_bg.jpg

top_bg.jpg

62 ms

logo.png

logo.png

111 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

41 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

69 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

179 ms

input.png

input.png

73 ms

search_bt.png

search_bt.png

106 ms

email.png

email.png

106 ms

menu_bg.jpg

menu_bg.jpg

109 ms

hover.jpg

hover.jpg

179 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

462 ms

footer.png

footer.png

180 ms

swz721bc_0-webfont.woff

swz721bc_0-webfont.woff

73 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

36 ms

base.js

base.js

77 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

176 ms

u3o6s91JBL8hdS-8zlKaE9_QjMMICyQyS6sMo66aQxY.js

u3o6s91JBL8hdS-8zlKaE9_QjMMICyQyS6sMo66aQxY.js

117 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

id

id

12 ms

Accessibility Review

lugripper.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lugripper.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lugripper.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lugripper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lugripper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lugripper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lug Ripper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: