Tools & Wizards About Us
lujo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

lujo.com

Rentlujo (Real Estate) luxury houses and apartments to rent in Spain.

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

lujo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lujo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lujo.com

Luxury houses and apartments to rent in s'Agaró and Costa Brava in Spain.

Visit lujo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lujo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lujo.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.116

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lujo.com

424 ms

villas-cottages-holiday-rentals-sale-sagaro-costa-brava-girona-barcelona.aspx

152 ms

bootstrap.min.css

242 ms

blueimp-gallery.min.css

358 ms

font-awesome.min.css

415 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Lujo.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) belongs to the original domain Lujo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lujo.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 37.6 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 951 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lujo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 230.4 kB
  • After minification 230.4 kB
  • After compression 206.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lujo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (49%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lujo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lujo.com

www.lujo.com

424 ms

villas-cottages-holiday-rentals-sale-sagaro-costa-brava-girona-barcelona.aspx

villas-cottages-holiday-rentals-sale-sagaro-costa-brava-girona-barcelona.aspx

152 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

242 ms

blueimp-gallery.min.css

blueimp-gallery.min.css

358 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

415 ms

scrollBanner.css

scrollBanner.css

430 ms

menu.css

menu.css

435 ms

webnet.css

webnet.css

551 ms

css

css

22 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

454 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

467 ms

element.js

element.js

42 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

637 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

648 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

542 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

583 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

584 ms

jquery.selectric.min.js

jquery.selectric.min.js

654 ms

js

js

84 ms

jquery-scrollLock.min.js

jquery-scrollLock.min.js

659 ms

jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js

jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js

688 ms

gpisoftware-modal-center.min.js

gpisoftware-modal-center.min.js

696 ms

gpisoftware.js

gpisoftware.js

745 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

logo-rentlujo.jpg

logo-rentlujo.jpg

228 ms

lupa_des.png

lupa_des.png

229 ms

villa-teixidor-2017-01-llistat.jpg

villa-teixidor-2017-01-llistat.jpg

324 ms

mas-fitor-01-llistat.jpg

mas-fitor-01-llistat.jpg

252 ms

mas-dansa-01-llistat.jpg

mas-dansa-01-llistat.jpg

365 ms

masia_rocadaro_01-llistat.jpg

masia_rocadaro_01-llistat.jpg

508 ms

masia-pals-rural-01-llistat.jpg

masia-pals-rural-01-llistat.jpg

619 ms

villa_garbi_00-llistat.jpg

villa_garbi_00-llistat.jpg

544 ms

villa-geranis-00-llistat.jpg

villa-geranis-00-llistat.jpg

580 ms

villa-laura-01-llistat.jpg

villa-laura-01-llistat.jpg

652 ms

villa-lujo-mas-nou-bis-01-llistat.jpg

villa-lujo-mas-nou-bis-01-llistat.jpg

590 ms

villa-ses-port-01-llistat.jpg

villa-ses-port-01-llistat.jpg

819 ms

villa-white-gavina-01-llistat.jpg

villa-white-gavina-01-llistat.jpg

864 ms

logo_api.jpg

logo_api.jpg

692 ms

facebook-picto.png

facebook-picto.png

704 ms

instagram-icon.png

instagram-icon.png

727 ms

pictoTelf_peu.png

pictoTelf_peu.png

760 ms

pictoMail_peu.png

pictoMail_peu.png

801 ms

logowebnet.png

logowebnet.png

815 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

36 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

25 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

759 ms

js

js

65 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

9 ms

like.php

like.php

102 ms

RJGwWDFd2_8.js

RJGwWDFd2_8.js

23 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

23 ms

Accessibility Review

lujo.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lujo.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lujo.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lujo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lujo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lujo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lujo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: