Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lumiscan.de

lumiscan.de

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

379 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

lumiscan.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lumiscan.de homepage info - get ready to check Lumiscan best content right away, or after learning these important things about lumiscan.de

This domain may be for sale!

Visit lumiscan.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Lumiscan.de page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lumiscan.de performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.213

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lumiscan.de

379 ms

lumiscan.de

514 ms

6e566a1639.css

112 ms

lessphp_be54d44bb3a775e43b0d91c6c0cc10ad4ad902ba.css

346 ms

MyFontsWebfontsKit.css

311 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Lumiscan.de, 4% (1 request) were made to Hello.myfonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) belongs to the original domain Lumiscan.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Lumiscan.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.5 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lumiscan images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (71%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lumiscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lumiscan.de accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lumiscan.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lumiscan.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lumiscan.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lumiscan.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lumiscan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: