3.2 sec in total
262 ms
1.9 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Lunaz content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lunaz.group
Old world style. New world substance.Lunaz Design furthers the legacies of the most celebrated classic cars in history through restoration, re-engineering and
Visit lunaz.groupWe analyzed Lunaz.group page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lunaz.group performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.935
3/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
262 ms
376 ms
74 ms
364 ms
359 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Lunaz.group, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) belongs to the original domain Lunaz.group.
Page size can be reduced by 112.2 kB (3%)
4.4 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lunaz.group main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 848 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunaz images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunaz.group has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (73%)
56
15
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunaz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lunaz.group
262 ms
lunaz.group
376 ms
js
74 ms
style.min.css
364 ms
bootstrap.min.css
359 ms
js_composer.min.css
42 ms
basic.min.css
347 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
72 ms
theme.min.css
67 ms
intlTelInput.min.css
69 ms
styles.css
429 ms
pix-essentials-style-2.css
95 ms
jquery.min.js
93 ms
jquery.json.min.js
110 ms
gravityforms.min.js
110 ms
api.js
68 ms
utils.min.js
135 ms
intlTelInput-jquery.min.js
135 ms
main.js
136 ms
phone-validate.js
137 ms
js
107 ms
style.min.css
127 ms
base.min.css
154 ms
css
96 ms
popper.min.js
127 ms
bootstrap.min.js
135 ms
core.min.js
145 ms
essentials-5.min.js
158 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
161 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
553 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
171 ms
dom-ready.min.js
181 ms
hooks.min.js
190 ms
i18n.min.js
202 ms
a11y.min.js
214 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
225 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
234 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
244 ms
index.bundle-4.js
259 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
276 ms
35 ms
27 ms
35 ms
20 ms
25 ms
js
117 ms
gtm.js
116 ms
lunaz-logo.svg
85 ms
JACK_WHITEHALL_X_LUNAZ_WEB.jpg
634 ms
biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling.jpg
692 ms
biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling-2.jpg
736 ms
LAT_Lunaz_003.jpg
735 ms
lunaz-group-design.jpg
86 ms
lunaz-group-powertrain_final.jpg
735 ms
Lunaz-HQ.jpg
86 ms
Lunaz-HQ-Holy-Trinity.jpg
88 ms
info.png
88 ms
recaptcha__en_gb.js
190 ms
pixicon.ttf
160 ms
lunaz.group accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
lunaz.group best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lunaz.group SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lunaz.group can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lunaz.group main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lunaz.group
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lunaz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: