Tools & Wizards About Us
lunaz.group screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

lunaz.group

Home - Lunaz Group

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

lunaz.group screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lunaz content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lunaz.group

BIFFA AND LUNAZ: PARTNERS IN UP-CYCLINGLunaz is delighted to announce a landmark fleet electrification partnership with Biffa, the UK’s leading sustainable

Visit lunaz.group

Key Findings

We analyzed Lunaz.group page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lunaz.group performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,380 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.935

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lunaz.group

262 ms

lunaz.group

376 ms

js

74 ms

style.min.css

364 ms

bootstrap.min.css

359 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Lunaz.group, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) belongs to the original domain Lunaz.group.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lunaz.group main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 104.9 kB

  • Original 128.4 kB
  • After minification 124.9 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 848 B

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunaz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 371.5 kB
  • After minification 371.5 kB
  • After compression 368.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 144.9 kB
  • After minification 144.9 kB
  • After compression 141.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunaz.group has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (73%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunaz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lunaz.group

lunaz.group

262 ms

lunaz.group

lunaz.group

376 ms

js

js

74 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

364 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

359 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

42 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

347 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

72 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

67 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

69 ms

styles.css

styles.css

429 ms

pix-essentials-style-2.css

pix-essentials-style-2.css

95 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

93 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

110 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

110 ms

api.js

api.js

68 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

135 ms

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

135 ms

main.js

main.js

136 ms

phone-validate.js

phone-validate.js

137 ms

js

js

107 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

127 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

154 ms

css

css

96 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

127 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

135 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

145 ms

essentials-5.min.js

essentials-5.min.js

158 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

161 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

553 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

171 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

181 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

190 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

202 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

214 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

225 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

234 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

244 ms

index.bundle-4.js

index.bundle-4.js

259 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

276 ms

35 ms

27 ms

35 ms

20 ms

25 ms

js

js

117 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

116 ms

lunaz-logo.svg

lunaz-logo.svg

85 ms

JACK_WHITEHALL_X_LUNAZ_WEB.jpg

JACK_WHITEHALL_X_LUNAZ_WEB.jpg

634 ms

biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling.jpg

biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling.jpg

692 ms

biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling-2.jpg

biffa-and-lunaz-partners-in-up-cycling-2.jpg

736 ms

LAT_Lunaz_003.jpg

LAT_Lunaz_003.jpg

735 ms

lunaz-group-design.jpg

lunaz-group-design.jpg

86 ms

lunaz-group-powertrain_final.jpg

lunaz-group-powertrain_final.jpg

735 ms

Lunaz-HQ.jpg

Lunaz-HQ.jpg

86 ms

Lunaz-HQ-Holy-Trinity.jpg

Lunaz-HQ-Holy-Trinity.jpg

88 ms

info.png

info.png

88 ms

recaptcha__en_gb.js

recaptcha__en_gb.js

190 ms

pixicon.ttf

pixicon.ttf

160 ms

Accessibility Review

lunaz.group accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Best Practices

lunaz.group best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lunaz.group SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lunaz.group can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lunaz.group main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lunaz.group

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lunaz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: