1.9 sec in total
224 ms
1.4 sec
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Luratech content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about luratech.com
Industry-Leading Document Conversion Technology for Enterprise. Faster Business Processes with Large-Scale Document to PDF Conversion.
Visit luratech.comWe analyzed Luratech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
luratech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
224 ms
202 ms
341 ms
102 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Luratech.com, 60% (18 requests) were made to Foxit.com and 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (425 ms) relates to the external source Foxit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 153.8 kB (27%)
563.7 kB
409.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Luratech.com main page is 563.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 165.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luratech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luratech.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (73%)
22
6
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luratech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
luratech.com
224 ms
www.luratech.com
202 ms
341 ms
css
102 ms
fonts.min.css
33 ms
3rdparty.min.css
54 ms
foxit-phil.min.css
67 ms
jquery.min.js
94 ms
75be1d9644.js
274 ms
foxit-common.min.js
122 ms
header-and-footer-2024-compatible.css
94 ms
header-and-footer-2024-compatible.js
121 ms
script.js
121 ms
evergage.min.js
272 ms
en-us.js
99 ms
foxit-partnerstack.js
118 ms
foxit-tip.js
117 ms
foxit-3rd.min.js
423 ms
jquery.lazy.min.js
424 ms
foxit-base.min.js
425 ms
dnb_coretag_v5.min.js
95 ms
loading.gif
162 ms
chat-naturally-concept.png
172 ms
maskot_header.webp
170 ms
header.webp
171 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
172 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
210 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
241 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
241 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
256 ms
luratech.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
luratech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
luratech.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luratech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luratech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luratech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luratech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: