Tools & Wizards About Us
lushlife.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

lushlife.co.in

Top Real Estate Developers & Builders in Pune|Famous Builders-LUSHlife

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

617 ms

lushlife.co.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lushlife.co.in homepage info - get ready to check LUSHlife best content right away, or after learning these important things about lushlife.co.in

LUSHlife Developers the leading real estate developer & builder offer the best luxury, budget and premium projects in Undri, Handewadi, Pune. LUSHlife offers a wide range of commercial and residential...

Visit lushlife.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lushlife.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lushlife.co.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lushlife.co.in

1314 ms

bootstrap.css

511 ms

style.css

1217 ms

responsive.css

516 ms

jquery.js

1018 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Lushlife.co.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lushlife.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lushlife.co.in main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LUSHlife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 193.3 kB

  • Original 550.2 kB
  • After minification 550.2 kB
  • After compression 356.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.3 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 71.3 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 160.5 kB
  • After compression 89.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lushlife.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LUSHlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lushlife.co.in

lushlife.co.in

1314 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

511 ms

style.css

style.css

1217 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

516 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1018 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

505 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

773 ms

wow.js

wow.js

761 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1018 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

1276 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

1272 ms

tilt.jquery.min.js

tilt.jquery.min.js

1035 ms

owl.js

owl.js

1326 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

1313 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

2150 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1527 ms

script.js

script.js

1544 ms

js

js

53 ms

map-script.js

map-script.js

1539 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1573 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

1585 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2029 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

2289 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

2535 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

2567 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

2333 ms

css

css

37 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

1063 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1195 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1315 ms

owl.css

owl.css

1325 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1373 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

1452 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

1561 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1572 ms

animated-headline.css

animated-headline.css

1582 ms

jquery.background-video.css

jquery.background-video.css

1606 ms

vegas.min.css

vegas.min.css

1624 ms

custom-animate.css

custom-animate.css

1718 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

1491 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

501 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

733 ms

sketch.png

sketch.png

510 ms

pattern.jpg

pattern.jpg

255 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

258 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

413 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

409 ms

Accessibility Review

lushlife.co.in accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lushlife.co.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lushlife.co.in SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lushlife.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lushlife.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lushlife.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LUSHlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: