Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

lustrecal.com

Lustre-Cal :: Property ID Labels, Labels, Nameplates, Asset Tags, Shielding, Domed Labels, Panels Overlays

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

647 ms

Page Rendered

449 ms

lustrecal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lustrecal.com homepage info - get ready to check Lustre Cal best content right away, or after learning these important things about lustrecal.com

Manufacturing of Nameplates, Property ID Labels, Labels, Shielding, Domed Labels, Panels Overlays, Wine Labels, Membrane Switches, Parking Permits, Full Color Asset Tags, Shop today and Quick SHIPPED ...

Visit lustrecal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lustrecal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lustrecal.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lustrecal.com

32 ms

www.lustrecal.com

109 ms

3a990f58-c314-4792-8b46-c1cced461c90.js

77 ms

bootstrap-4.5.3.min.css

21 ms

xpicons.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Lustrecal.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Bat.bing.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) belongs to the original domain Lustrecal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 210.2 kB (26%)

Content Size

807.4 kB

After Optimization

597.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Lustrecal.com main page is 807.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 364.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 135.3 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.1 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 364.6 kB
  • After minification 356.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lustre Cal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 60.2 kB

  • Original 214.5 kB
  • After minification 214.4 kB
  • After compression 154.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.2 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 93.0 kB
  • After minification 91.0 kB
  • After compression 60.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lustrecal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (58%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lustre Cal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lustrecal.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lustrecal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lustrecal.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lustrecal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lustrecal.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lustre Cal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: