Tools & Wizards About Us
luxgroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

luxgroup.com

Luxury Escapes - Handpicked Escapes at the Best Prices on Earth

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

7 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

3.8 sec

luxgroup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit luxgroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Luxgroup content for New Zealand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luxgroup.com

Find the latest luxury travel ideas & exclusive special offers at insider prices. Save on holiday travel & accommodation packages with Luxury Escapes.

Visit luxgroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luxgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luxgroup.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luxuryescapes.com

7 ms

luxuryescapes.com

1004 ms

genesys.min.js

1308 ms

client

156 ms

gtm.js

261 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Luxgroup.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Luxuryescapes.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Apps.mypurecloud.com.au. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Apps.mypurecloud.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (28%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Luxgroup.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 278.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luxgroup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 89.0 kB
  • After compression 89.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (32%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

44

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luxgroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luxuryescapes.com

luxuryescapes.com

7 ms

luxuryescapes.com

luxuryescapes.com

1004 ms

genesys.min.js

genesys.min.js

1308 ms

client

client

156 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

261 ms

hotjar-726845.js

hotjar-726845.js

171 ms

LE-fonts.css

LE-fonts.css

31 ms

whatsapp-logo.svg

whatsapp-logo.svg

244 ms

round-flag-US.svg

round-flag-US.svg

275 ms

round-flag-AU.svg

round-flag-AU.svg

283 ms

round-flag-NZ.svg

round-flag-NZ.svg

288 ms

round-flag-SG.svg

round-flag-SG.svg

285 ms

round-flag-GB.svg

round-flag-GB.svg

283 ms

round-flag-CA.svg

round-flag-CA.svg

289 ms

round-flag-CN.svg

round-flag-CN.svg

287 ms

round-flag-FR.svg

round-flag-FR.svg

291 ms

round-flag-DE.svg

round-flag-DE.svg

292 ms

round-flag-HK.svg

round-flag-HK.svg

295 ms

round-flag-IN.svg

round-flag-IN.svg

301 ms

round-flag-ID.svg

round-flag-ID.svg

298 ms

round-flag-IE.svg

round-flag-IE.svg

295 ms

round-flag-IL.svg

round-flag-IL.svg

293 ms

round-flag-IT.svg

round-flag-IT.svg

298 ms

round-flag-JP.svg

round-flag-JP.svg

301 ms

round-flag-KR.svg

round-flag-KR.svg

302 ms

round-flag-MO.svg

round-flag-MO.svg

305 ms

round-flag-MY.svg

round-flag-MY.svg

306 ms

round-flag-NL.svg

round-flag-NL.svg

304 ms

round-flag-PH.svg

round-flag-PH.svg

307 ms

round-flag-QA.svg

round-flag-QA.svg

306 ms

round-flag-SA.svg

round-flag-SA.svg

310 ms

round-flag-ZA.svg

round-flag-ZA.svg

309 ms

round-flag-ES.svg

round-flag-ES.svg

312 ms

round-flag-TW.svg

round-flag-TW.svg

314 ms

round-flag-TH.svg

round-flag-TH.svg

311 ms

round-flag-AE.svg

round-flag-AE.svg

315 ms

round-flag-VN.svg

round-flag-VN.svg

314 ms

6svtlrw2gsl57dv2jzp7

6svtlrw2gsl57dv2jzp7

326 ms

3sk6beq17m4ciocgcu6o

3sk6beq17m4ciocgcu6o

321 ms

6rhy6oot2azhynjm48l

6rhy6oot2azhynjm48l

322 ms

xh9ixdaf8y6j45uojr3s

xh9ixdaf8y6j45uojr3s

323 ms

ewhq5pazyqcpkrjsez8h

ewhq5pazyqcpkrjsez8h

323 ms

jiyjsiv4bh2o6x6xmx2j

jiyjsiv4bh2o6x6xmx2j

325 ms

SuisseIntl-Book.woff

SuisseIntl-Book.woff

66 ms

SuisseIntl-Regular.woff

SuisseIntl-Regular.woff

104 ms

SuisseIntl-Medium.woff

SuisseIntl-Medium.woff

103 ms

SuisseIntl-SemiBold.woff

SuisseIntl-SemiBold.woff

102 ms

xiq5u6sn1mp9x2n5z0dp

xiq5u6sn1mp9x2n5z0dp

57 ms

qk4rpcmvvknpl7eki0id

qk4rpcmvvknpl7eki0id

48 ms

dapbr82l65bcj5iy6v8

dapbr82l65bcj5iy6v8

46 ms

m4q0xykf28g85c3uv1r

m4q0xykf28g85c3uv1r

46 ms

eoo7x60icwbgndyc1wcge

eoo7x60icwbgndyc1wcge

43 ms

vg4uvt2y5dgkivujuba6

vg4uvt2y5dgkivujuba6

44 ms

rasl0402sq9ft6vloi7b

rasl0402sq9ft6vloi7b

44 ms

1x64o7uzz17yf0lu1o

1x64o7uzz17yf0lu1o

40 ms

wbk1yjnf56awezs1lu

wbk1yjnf56awezs1lu

42 ms

h1t0c6c9brq83bwhazx

h1t0c6c9brq83bwhazx

41 ms

mky1rem3l8kdhe9h78b

mky1rem3l8kdhe9h78b

40 ms

lids8h5rs9zj2xvkxr

lids8h5rs9zj2xvkxr

40 ms

bh52x5crz46nt54uxsl

bh52x5crz46nt54uxsl

39 ms

2agstgb25xcdai5sl2y

2agstgb25xcdai5sl2y

39 ms

f2cbkfa3neeqk0suw16u

f2cbkfa3neeqk0suw16u

37 ms

b9zscnyfu1jgdt0jnw

b9zscnyfu1jgdt0jnw

37 ms

0on515yb0rhspnl20ef

0on515yb0rhspnl20ef

36 ms

ojyl1j534o4kmwkyjald

ojyl1j534o4kmwkyjald

36 ms

k58oh9ebyasvjo9ndff

k58oh9ebyasvjo9ndff

36 ms

exu2capyq66fvv752yc4

exu2capyq66fvv752yc4

35 ms

5rw20hquxqn9qozzg79p

5rw20hquxqn9qozzg79p

34 ms

ufils1y5jgf0yhvf5utk

ufils1y5jgf0yhvf5utk

34 ms

fvp335n5vdcvhn6j1t4o

fvp335n5vdcvhn6j1t4o

34 ms

afof01h0vxhcgx9iygmn

afof01h0vxhcgx9iygmn

32 ms

Accessibility Review

luxgroup.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

luxgroup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

luxgroup.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luxgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luxgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luxgroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luxgroup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: