Tools & Wizards About Us
luxortile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

luxortile.com

Granite Countertops | Marble and Tile Installation | Atlanta, GA

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

luxortile.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to luxortile.com homepage info - get ready to check Luxor Tile best content right away, or after learning these important things about luxortile.com

Deep discounts on tile and granite countertops from Atlanta's premier granite countertop installer. Over 500 granite slabs for just $25/square foot!

Visit luxortile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luxortile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luxortile.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luxortile.com

171 ms

luxortile.com

249 ms

www.luxortile.com

126 ms

www.luxortile.com

256 ms

reset.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Luxortile.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (481 ms) belongs to the original domain Luxortile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

182.4 kB

After Optimization

136.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luxortile.com main page is 182.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 148.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 148.8 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Luxor Tile needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luxortile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (60%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luxor Tile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luxortile.com

luxortile.com

171 ms

luxortile.com

luxortile.com

249 ms

www.luxortile.com

www.luxortile.com

126 ms

www.luxortile.com

www.luxortile.com

256 ms

reset.css

reset.css

67 ms

main.css

main.css

130 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

ga.js

ga.js

17 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

70 ms

luxor-logo2.png

luxor-logo2.png

143 ms

phone-icon2.png

phone-icon2.png

75 ms

tray.gif

tray.gif

136 ms

tray-active.gif

tray-active.gif

143 ms

tray-separator.gif

tray-separator.gif

187 ms

col-top.gif

col-top.gif

188 ms

col.gif

col.gif

200 ms

ribbon.gif

ribbon.gif

202 ms

space.gif

space.gif

203 ms

browser.gif

browser.gif

264 ms

btn-tell.gif

btn-tell.gif

250 ms

col-bottom.gif

col-bottom.gif

251 ms

cols3-top.gif

cols3-top.gif

265 ms

cols3.gif

cols3.gif

265 ms

cols3-title.gif

cols3-title.gif

263 ms

countertops.jpg

countertops.jpg

481 ms

ul-01.gif

ul-01.gif

320 ms

cols3-more.gif

cols3-more.gif

326 ms

backsplash.jpg

backsplash.jpg

327 ms

tile2.jpg

tile2.jpg

384 ms

cols3-bottom.gif

cols3-bottom.gif

326 ms

cols2-top.gif

cols2-top.gif

381 ms

cols2.gif

cols2.gif

386 ms

dot.gif

dot.gif

387 ms

dot-02.gif

dot-02.gif

386 ms

mail.png

mail.png

446 ms

ask-expert.png

ask-expert.png

446 ms

cols2-bottom.gif

cols2-bottom.gif

448 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

72 ms

print.css

print.css

87 ms

Accessibility Review

luxortile.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

luxortile.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

luxortile.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luxortile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luxortile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luxortile.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luxor Tile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: