Tools & Wizards About Us
luxwrite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

Page Load Speed

28.5 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

24.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

luxwrite.com screenshot

About Website

Visit luxwrite.com now to see the best up-to-date Luxwrite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luxwrite.com

Visit luxwrite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luxwrite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 27 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

luxwrite.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value15,780 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.luxwrite.com

1468 ms

style.css

419 ms

animsition.min.css

571 ms

bootstrap.css

1274 ms

font-awesome.css

563 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Luxwrite.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

999.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luxwrite.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 816.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 816.5 kB
  • After minification 801.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luxwrite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 158.1 kB
  • After minification 158.1 kB
  • After compression 135.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 60.2 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 56.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luxwrite.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (91%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luxwrite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.luxwrite.com

www.luxwrite.com

1468 ms

style.css

style.css

419 ms

animsition.min.css

animsition.min.css

571 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1274 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

563 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

573 ms

iestyles.css

iestyles.css

521 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

937 ms

swipebox.min.css

swipebox.min.css

913 ms

template.css

template.css

1287 ms

css

css

44 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1595 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

929 ms

19166803.js

19166803.js

20192 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1130 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1166 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1176 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1641 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1641 ms

jquery.animsition.min.js

jquery.animsition.min.js

1642 ms

jquery.blast.min.js

jquery.blast.min.js

1642 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

1643 ms

jquery.imagesloaded.js

jquery.imagesloaded.js

1817 ms

jquery.infinitescroll.js

jquery.infinitescroll.js

2003 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

1836 ms

jquery.modernizr.js

jquery.modernizr.js

1844 ms

jquery.nicescroll.js

jquery.nicescroll.js

2571 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

2241 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

2194 ms

jquery.swipebox.js

jquery.swipebox.js

2193 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.js

jquery.touchSwipe.js

2232 ms

jquery.velocity.min.js

jquery.velocity.min.js

2693 ms

jquery.velocity.ui.min.js

jquery.velocity.ui.min.js

2548 ms

jquery.wip.js

jquery.wip.js

2548 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2595 ms

19363733.js

19363733.js

20036 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

2463 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

3083 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

64 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1784 ms

Accessibility Review

luxwrite.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

luxwrite.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

luxwrite.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luxwrite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luxwrite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luxwrite.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luxwrite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: