Tools & Wizards About Us
luzcar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

luzcar.com

Luzcar Rent a Car Algarve, Aluguer carros - Aeroporto de Faro, Lagos, Portugal

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

872 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

213 ms

luzcar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to luzcar.com homepage info - get ready to check Luzcar best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about luzcar.com

Rentacar,algarve,lagos,aeroporto faro,ferias,aluguer carros

Visit luzcar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luzcar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 872 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luzcar.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.288

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luzcar.com

872 ms

gtm.js

58 ms

fbevents.js

28 ms

img3_slider.jpg

367 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Luzcar.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Bo.moonshapes.pt and 12% (6 requests) were made to Bo.proppycrm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (872 ms) belongs to the original domain Luzcar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

605.2 kB

After Optimization

334.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Luzcar.com main page is 605.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 316.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 262.2 kB

  • Original 316.4 kB
  • After minification 298.9 kB
  • After compression 54.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 252.1 kB
  • After minification 243.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luzcar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 483 B

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 36.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luzcar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luzcar.com

luzcar.com

872 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

58 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

28 ms

img3_slider.jpg

img3_slider.jpg

367 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

194 ms

img1_slider.jpg

img1_slider.jpg

382 ms

img2_slider.jpg

img2_slider.jpg

386 ms

1676563432_0.jpg

1676563432_0.jpg

385 ms

1676564614_0.jpg

1676564614_0.jpg

386 ms

1580986538_0.jpg

1580986538_0.jpg

387 ms

bg-header.jpg

bg-header.jpg

257 ms

flag-pt.jpg

flag-pt.jpg

255 ms

flag-en.jpg

flag-en.jpg

256 ms

flag-de.jpg

flag-de.jpg

256 ms

flag-fr.jpg

flag-fr.jpg

255 ms

flag-es.jpg

flag-es.jpg

283 ms

flag-it.jpg

flag-it.jpg

283 ms

flag-nl.jpg

flag-nl.jpg

289 ms

flag-dk.jpg

flag-dk.jpg

283 ms

flag-se.jpg

flag-se.jpg

288 ms

flag-pl.jpg

flag-pl.jpg

295 ms

logo-luzcar.png

logo-luzcar.png

357 ms

icon-info.png

icon-info.png

362 ms

icon-question.png

icon-question.png

365 ms

livro-reclamacoes.png

livro-reclamacoes.png

364 ms

icon-clouds.png

icon-clouds.png

365 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

38 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

110 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

32 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

7 ms

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

424 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

19 ms

like.php

like.php

138 ms

img3_slider.jpg

img3_slider.jpg

440 ms

img1_slider.jpg

img1_slider.jpg

790 ms

1676563432_0.jpg

1676563432_0.jpg

805 ms

img2_slider.jpg

img2_slider.jpg

795 ms

1676564614_0.jpg

1676564614_0.jpg

806 ms

1580986538_0.jpg

1580986538_0.jpg

793 ms

59-yfCThKmH.js

59-yfCThKmH.js

19 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

11 ms

272f541e89-img3_slider.jpg

272f541e89-img3_slider.jpg

521 ms

272f541e89-img1_slider.jpg

272f541e89-img1_slider.jpg

324 ms

8c8fd539db-1580986538_0.jpg

8c8fd539db-1580986538_0.jpg

414 ms

272f541e89-img2_slider.jpg

272f541e89-img2_slider.jpg

503 ms

8c8fd539db-1676563432_0.jpg

8c8fd539db-1676563432_0.jpg

415 ms

8c8fd539db-1676564614_0.jpg

8c8fd539db-1676564614_0.jpg

417 ms

Accessibility Review

luzcar.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

luzcar.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

luzcar.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PT

  • Language Claimed

    PT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luzcar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luzcar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luzcar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luzcar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: