4.7 sec in total
1.4 sec
3 sec
302 ms
Click here to check amazing Luzliving content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about luzliving.com
Visit luzliving.comWe analyzed Luzliving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
luzliving.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.2 s
0/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
1405 ms
508 ms
24 ms
36 ms
638 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Luzliving.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Luzliving.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (47%)
3.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Luzliving.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 303.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Luzliving needs image optimization as it can save up to 303.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 548.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 548.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 585.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luzliving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 585.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (61%)
59
23
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luzliving. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
luzliving.com
1405 ms
frontend_style.css
508 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
bootstrap.css
638 ms
bootstrap_adv.css
574 ms
style.css
530 ms
template.css
135 ms
style.css
503 ms
chosen.css
180 ms
jquery-ui.css
14 ms
font-awesome.min.css
234 ms
nucleus.css
197 ms
ambrosia_11.css
221 ms
bootstrap-gantry.css
281 ms
joomla.css
215 ms
icomoon.css
246 ms
ambrosia-joomla_11.css
286 ms
custom_11.css
291 ms
ajax.js
567 ms
jquery.min.js
711 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
572 ms
bootstrap.min.js
593 ms
mootools-core.js
381 ms
core.js
342 ms
mootools-more.js
526 ms
jquery.min.js
419 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
362 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
384 ms
bootstrap.min.js
441 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
438 ms
font-awesome.min.css
662 ms
layout3.css
648 ms
modernizr.custom.js
669 ms
jquery-ui.js
7 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
678 ms
autoNumeric.js
866 ms
main.js
463 ms
css
13 ms
luzliving.png
135 ms
5_20160312_1374332249.jpg
606 ms
compare24_gray.png
168 ms
15a_20150619_1043292736.jpg
607 ms
19a_20150623_2067482744.jpg
606 ms
39a_20150628_1112473659.jpg
605 ms
82a_20150705_1048895887.jpg
603 ms
02a_20150726_1213561499.jpg
608 ms
5514463872994dbf6c2c8105dfa2fe9c713c1f339d34.jpg
608 ms
12a_20151101_1577106045.jpg
610 ms
58a_20151124_1290666286.jpg
608 ms
79_20160303_1598724559.jpg
682 ms
es.gif
118 ms
en.gif
118 ms
osp_icon.svg
553 ms
robotocondensed-bold-webfont.woff
192 ms
robotocondensed-regular-webfont.woff
192 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
190 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
58 ms
roboto-bold-webfont.woff
190 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
564 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
484 ms
IcoMoon.svg
356 ms
IcoMoon.svg
486 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
121 ms
chosen-sprite.png
134 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
79 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
80 ms
luzliving.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
luzliving.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
luzliving.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luzliving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luzliving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luzliving.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luzliving. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: