Tools & Wizards About Us
lvbodysculpting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lvbodysculpting.com

Top Cosmetic Surgeon Henderson, NV | Las Vegas Body Sculpting

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

490 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

387 ms

lvbodysculpting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lv Body Sculpting content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lvbodysculpting.com

Our Practice is Ranked #1 in Cosmetic Surgery in Henderson, NV specializing in Body Sculpting. Click to learn more.

Visit lvbodysculpting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lvbodysculpting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lvbodysculpting.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lvbodysculpting.com

490 ms

header-39a90a9bc96d94687388e9a716426f0f836b410c.min.js

15 ms

js

141 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

48 ms

footer-c42fcb2fe12dd4c90cf1a4695277c17d0c3a8ac6.min.js

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Lvbodysculpting.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lvbodysculpting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 428.6 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

978.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lvbodysculpting.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 766.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 377.4 kB

  • Original 448.0 kB
  • After minification 448.0 kB
  • After compression 70.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 377.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 766.5 kB
  • After minification 715.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lv Body Sculpting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 526 B

  • Original 186.8 kB
  • After minification 186.8 kB
  • After compression 186.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lvbodysculpting.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lv Body Sculpting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lvbodysculpting.com

www.lvbodysculpting.com

490 ms

header-39a90a9bc96d94687388e9a716426f0f836b410c.min.js

header-39a90a9bc96d94687388e9a716426f0f836b410c.min.js

15 ms

js

js

141 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

48 ms

footer-c42fcb2fe12dd4c90cf1a4695277c17d0c3a8ac6.min.js

footer-c42fcb2fe12dd4c90cf1a4695277c17d0c3a8ac6.min.js

48 ms

firebase-app.js

firebase-app.js

62 ms

firebase-messaging.js

firebase-messaging.js

91 ms

footer-516867d171fd0618b07fe1658473bd3fb02864f3.min.js

footer-516867d171fd0618b07fe1658473bd3fb02864f3.min.js

47 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

50 ms

widget.js

widget.js

195 ms

logo.png

logo.png

132 ms

feature-bg.jpg

feature-bg.jpg

563 ms

feature-bg-2.jpg

feature-bg-2.jpg

31 ms

bna-04-new1.png

bna-04-new1.png

59 ms

bna-01-new1.png

bna-01-new1.png

108 ms

bna-02-new1.png

bna-02-new1.png

468 ms

bna-03-new1.png

bna-03-new1.png

498 ms

aacs-logo.png

aacs-logo.png

410 ms

labels.png

labels.png

449 ms

office-03.png

office-03.png

571 ms

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

420 ms

roboto-medium-webfont.woff

roboto-medium-webfont.woff

785 ms

roboto-light-webfont.woff

roboto-light-webfont.woff

827 ms

roboto-thin-webfont.woff

roboto-thin-webfont.woff

856 ms

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

883 ms

talkfurther_init.min.js

talkfurther_init.min.js

80 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

551 ms

Italiana-Regular.ttf

Italiana-Regular.ttf

839 ms

roboto-bolditalic-webfont.woff

roboto-bolditalic-webfont.woff

951 ms

roboto-mediumitalic-webfont.woff

roboto-mediumitalic-webfont.woff

1108 ms

roboto-italic-webfont.woff

roboto-italic-webfont.woff

1127 ms

roboto-lightitalic-webfont.woff

roboto-lightitalic-webfont.woff

1142 ms

roboto-thinitalic-webfont.woff

roboto-thinitalic-webfont.woff

1178 ms

widget_app_base_1709819000034.js

widget_app_base_1709819000034.js

20 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

14 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

439 ms

Accessibility Review

lvbodysculpting.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lvbodysculpting.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lvbodysculpting.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lvbodysculpting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lvbodysculpting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lvbodysculpting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lv Body Sculpting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: