7.4 sec in total
231 ms
6.6 sec
591 ms
Welcome to lwcdial.net homepage info - get ready to check Lwcdial best content right away, or after learning these important things about lwcdial.net
London Web From desktop to Cloud, whatever your IT/Online needs, we can provide the solution. Premium quality solutions supported by over 16 years of experience and delivered with passion, agility and...
Visit lwcdial.netWe analyzed Lwcdial.net page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
lwcdial.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.7 s
0/100
10%
Value26.9 s
0/100
25%
Value22.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,990 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.662
8/100
15%
Value26.6 s
0/100
10%
231 ms
1881 ms
19 ms
47 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lwcdial.net, 77% (74 requests) were made to Londonweb.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Londonweb.net.
Page size can be reduced by 219.4 kB (14%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lwcdial.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 679.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 217.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 217.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 335 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lwcdial images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 323 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lwcdial.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (77%)
73
17
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lwcdial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lwcdial.net
231 ms
londonweb.net
1881 ms
main.min.css
19 ms
css
47 ms
pa-frontend-81a1b11d7.min.css
119 ms
astra-addon-66c4e58c430e17-55264207.css
29 ms
frontend.min.css
36 ms
general.min.css
47 ms
eael-2.css
45 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
71 ms
swiper.min.css
46 ms
post-7.css
49 ms
frontend.min.css
55 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
72 ms
all.min.css
98 ms
v4-shims.min.css
96 ms
post-2.css
103 ms
post-32599.css
105 ms
search-forms.css
101 ms
style.css
105 ms
css
44 ms
fontawesome.min.css
108 ms
regular.min.css
107 ms
brands.min.css
106 ms
solid.min.css
112 ms
jquery.min.js
111 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
113 ms
v4-shims.min.js
137 ms
js
253 ms
email-decode.min.js
109 ms
animations.min.css
135 ms
premium-shape-divider.min.css
168 ms
frontend.min.js
188 ms
pa-frontend-81a1b11d7.min.js
248 ms
dom-ready.min.js
212 ms
main.js
210 ms
astra-addon-66c4e58c436e06-26193519.js
211 ms
general.min.js
213 ms
eael-2.js
214 ms
script.min.js
211 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
207 ms
anime.min.js
192 ms
premium-shape-divider.min.js
179 ms
fontawesome-all.min.js
180 ms
TweenMax.min.js
176 ms
motionpath.min.js
175 ms
universal-tilt.min.js
178 ms
lottie.min.js
159 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
132 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
138 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
140 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
133 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
310 ms
hooks.min.js
131 ms
i18n.min.js
304 ms
frontend.min.js
145 ms
waypoints.min.js
144 ms
core.min.js
144 ms
frontend.min.js
297 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
297 ms
KPMG.png
263 ms
Amazon.png
353 ms
NHS.png
353 ms
Papa-johns.png
561 ms
RBL.png
561 ms
Monzo-1.png
561 ms
DEC.png
560 ms
2-117x117.png
245 ms
tower-bridge-river-london-5762070.jpg
241 ms
3.png
244 ms
stevenpunter.jpeg
241 ms
alexstender-614x768.webp
350 ms
jamielinked-1.jpeg
240 ms
alexbleiker-614x768.webp
330 ms
LONDON-WEB-6-85x85.png
306 ms
KPMG.png
155 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
120 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
276 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
280 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
284 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
284 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
282 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
280 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
283 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
281 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
284 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
279 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
285 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
76 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
4 ms
Amazon.png
49 ms
NHS.png
204 ms
RBL.png
66 ms
DEC.png
63 ms
Papa-johns.png
63 ms
Monzo-1.png
63 ms
lwcdial.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lwcdial.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lwcdial.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lwcdial.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lwcdial.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lwcdial.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lwcdial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: