Tools & Wizards About Us
lwebg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

lwebg.com

Web Page Design | Ecommerce Website Design | Mobile Website Designers | LwebG | Louisville, KY

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

788 ms

lwebg.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lwebg.com now to see the best up-to-date LwebG content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lwebg.com

A website design and development company that can offer proven results, offering CMS solutions as a standard feature. We build Kentuckiana's most powerful online business tools.

Visit lwebg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lwebg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lwebg.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.125

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lwebg.com

29 ms

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

90 ms

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

618 ms

font-awesome.min.css

56 ms

modernizr.min.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lwebg.com, 73% (67 requests) were made to Louisvillewebgroup.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) relates to the external source Louisvillewebgroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (15%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lwebg.com main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 297.8 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LwebG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 430.3 kB

  • Original 830.7 kB
  • After minification 788.3 kB
  • After compression 400.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 253.9 kB

  • Original 319.9 kB
  • After minification 264.3 kB
  • After compression 66.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lwebg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (74%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LwebG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lwebg.com

lwebg.com

29 ms

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

90 ms

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

www.louisvillewebgroup.com

618 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

56 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

68 ms

api.js

api.js

65 ms

system.base.css

system.base.css

60 ms

codefilter.css

codefilter.css

59 ms

field.css

field.css

64 ms

user-alert.css

user-alert.css

59 ms

views.css

views.css

60 ms

ckeditor.css

ckeditor.css

63 ms

ctools.css

ctools.css

93 ms

panels.css

panels.css

94 ms

flexslider_img.css

flexslider_img.css

93 ms

honeypot.css

honeypot.css

94 ms

webform.css

webform.css

94 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

99 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

163 ms

pace.min.js

pace.min.js

98 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

51 ms

overrides.css

overrides.css

105 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

105 ms

style.css

style.css

166 ms

settings.css

settings.css

171 ms

settings-ie8.css

settings-ie8.css

163 ms

font.css

font.css

160 ms

css

css

57 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

182 ms

jquery.once.js

jquery.once.js

164 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

169 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

59 ms

codefilter.js

codefilter.js

167 ms

user-alert.js

user-alert.js

175 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

176 ms

captcha.js

captcha.js

177 ms

textarea.js

textarea.js

176 ms

webform.js

webform.js

177 ms

googleanalytics.js

googleanalytics.js

179 ms

custom.js

custom.js

196 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

195 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

197 ms

jquery.hoverdir.js

jquery.hoverdir.js

198 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

234 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

164 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

151 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

154 ms

Chart.min.js

Chart.min.js

154 ms

project_detail.js

project_detail.js

157 ms

blog_animations.js

blog_animations.js

160 ms

extra_animations.js

extra_animations.js

185 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

27 ms

charts_animations.js

charts_animations.js

156 ms

shinbun_main.js

shinbun_main.js

156 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

171 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

184 ms

flexslider.load.js

flexslider.load.js

156 ms

livechat.js

livechat.js

153 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

153 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

js

js

176 ms

blue-seal-200-42-whitetxt-bbb-32000171.png

blue-seal-200-42-whitetxt-bbb-32000171.png

284 ms

lwebgbg.png

lwebgbg.png

360 ms

L_0.png

L_0.png

142 ms

back-logo.png

back-logo.png

142 ms

acbfrontpage_0.png

acbfrontpage_0.png

425 ms

aoptfrontpage_100x725.png

aoptfrontpage_100x725.png

369 ms

PlanChoice-1000x669.png

PlanChoice-1000x669.png

281 ms

WGS-Home-462x246.jpg

WGS-Home-462x246.jpg

234 ms

Milkweed%201000x725_0.png

Milkweed%201000x725_0.png

365 ms

Star%20Clinic%20Home%201000x725.png

Star%20Clinic%20Home%201000x725.png

359 ms

OCFC%20frontpage%201000x725.png

OCFC%20frontpage%201000x725.png

422 ms

Bayer-Becker-462x246.jpg

Bayer-Becker-462x246.jpg

367 ms

Brechers%201000x725.png

Brechers%201000x725.png

423 ms

stripe.png

stripe.png

417 ms

L_0.png

L_0.png

419 ms

logo_inverse.png

logo_inverse.png

420 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

64 ms

anchor

anchor

98 ms

grippie.png

grippie.png

288 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

96 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

35 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

56 ms

uHwOhFiU9RfT_VdtBfqn8JJh2736_YS1jvyd5cWfFWI.js

uHwOhFiU9RfT_VdtBfqn8JJh2736_YS1jvyd5cWfFWI.js

28 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

30 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

18 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

35 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

32 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

35 ms

Accessibility Review

lwebg.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lwebg.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lwebg.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lwebg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lwebg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lwebg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LwebG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: