Tools & Wizards About Us
lynkit.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 0

    SEO

lynkit.in

Lynkit - Orchestrating Efficiency In Your Supply Chain

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

1 ms

lynkit.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lynkit.in homepage info - get ready to check Lynkit best content right away, or after learning these important things about lynkit.in

Automate and digitally transform your supply chain with Lynkit's blockchain, telematics and IoT based logistics optimisation solutions.

Visit lynkit.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lynkit.in page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lynkit.in performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,560 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lynkit.in

13 ms

lynkit.in

785 ms

js

128 ms

gtm.js

207 ms

custom-toast.css

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Lynkit.in, 47% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (785 ms) belongs to the original domain Lynkit.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 kB (0%)

Content Size

285.2 kB

After Optimization

284.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lynkit.in main page is 285.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 210.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 977 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 901 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 977 B or 52% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 210.2 kB
  • After minification 210.2 kB
  • After compression 210.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 219 B

  • Original 73.1 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB
  • After compression 72.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lynkit.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (87%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lynkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lynkit.in

lynkit.in

13 ms

lynkit.in

lynkit.in

785 ms

js

js

128 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

207 ms

custom-toast.css

custom-toast.css

3 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

27 ms

main.a81ddbe1.js

main.a81ddbe1.js

16 ms

main.6637afb1.css

main.6637afb1.css

21 ms

custom-toast.js

custom-toast.js

19 ms

css2

css2

42 ms

css2

css2

60 ms

css2

css2

62 ms

css2

css2

68 ms

css2

css2

64 ms

css2

css2

65 ms

css2

css2

64 ms

css2

css2

76 ms

Accessibility Review

lynkit.in accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lynkit.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lynkit.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lynkit.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lynkit.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lynkit.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lynkit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: