4.1 sec in total
285 ms
3.7 sec
60 ms
Click here to check amazing Lyricsmaker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lyricsmaker.in
Visit lyricsmaker.inWe analyzed Lyricsmaker.in page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lyricsmaker.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
285 ms
2463 ms
97 ms
39 ms
377 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Lyricsmaker.in, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Lyricsmaker.in.
Page size can be reduced by 83.9 kB (13%)
621.9 kB
537.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lyricsmaker.in main page is 621.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 336.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lyricsmaker needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 569 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lyricsmaker.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (87%)
30
4
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lyricsmaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lyricsmaker.in
285 ms
lyricsmaker.in
2463 ms
style.min.css
97 ms
css
39 ms
main.css
377 ms
font-awesome.4.7.0.swap.min.css
284 ms
penci-icon.css
283 ms
style.css
287 ms
social-counter.css
286 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
285 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
417 ms
swiper.min.css
419 ms
post-9.css
420 ms
global.css
414 ms
general.min.css
420 ms
style.css
467 ms
css
33 ms
jquery.min.js
563 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
473 ms
js
68 ms
adsbygoogle.js
107 ms
play.js
471 ms
penci-lazy.js
471 ms
libs-script.min.js
700 ms
main.js
558 ms
post-like.js
646 ms
comment-reply.min.js
645 ms
penci-header-builder.js
646 ms
general.min.js
698 ms
Logo.png
135 ms
show_ads_impl.js
229 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
78 ms
penciicon.ttf
96 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
281 ms
ads
33 ms
lyricsmaker.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lyricsmaker.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lyricsmaker.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lyricsmaker.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lyricsmaker.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lyricsmaker.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lyricsmaker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: