Tools & Wizards About Us
lytesite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lytesite.com

LyteSite – Free Membership Site Where You Can Download Original & 100% Free Premium WordPress Plugins & Themes

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

81 ms

lytesite.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lytesite.com now to see the best up-to-date Lyte Site content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lytesite.com

Visit lytesite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lytesite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lytesite.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lytesite.com

138 ms

lytesite.com

268 ms

theme.css

65 ms

style.min.css

130 ms

styles.css

198 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Lytesite.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (633 ms) belongs to the original domain Lytesite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

422.2 kB

After Optimization

322.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lytesite.com main page is 422.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 186.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 46.5 kB
  • After minification 45.1 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 186.7 kB
  • After minification 186.7 kB
  • After compression 160.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 162.3 kB
  • After minification 162.3 kB
  • After compression 124.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lytesite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (88%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lyte Site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lytesite.com

lytesite.com

138 ms

lytesite.com

lytesite.com

268 ms

theme.css

theme.css

65 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

130 ms

styles.css

styles.css

198 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

199 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

202 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

200 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

266 ms

post-139.css

post-139.css

205 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

307 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

297 ms

post-280.css

post-280.css

286 ms

post-295.css

post-295.css

286 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

301 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

397 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

348 ms

css

css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

420 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

358 ms

js

js

74 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

370 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

371 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

437 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

504 ms

index.js

index.js

504 ms

index.js

index.js

504 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

505 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

505 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

613 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

505 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

506 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

563 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

531 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

565 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

565 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

568 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

594 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

632 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

633 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

576 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

203 ms

font

font

18 ms

font

font

24 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

344 ms

Accessibility Review

lytesite.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lytesite.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lytesite.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lytesite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lytesite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lytesite.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lyte Site. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: