Tools & Wizards About Us
lythamroadsurgery.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 68

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

210 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

491 ms

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lythamroadsurgery.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Lythamroadsurgery best content right away, or after learning these important things about lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

Visit lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.37

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

210 ms

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

448 ms

js

112 ms

normalize.css

185 ms

foundation.min.css

221 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk, 9% (8 requests) were made to Cqc.org.uk and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (909 ms) belongs to the original domain Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 48.2 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 54.9 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lythamroadsurgery images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 279.6 kB
  • After minification 279.4 kB
  • After compression 263.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (69%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lythamroadsurgery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

210 ms

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

448 ms

js

js

112 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

185 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

221 ms

table.css

table.css

297 ms

ResponsiveStyle2Light.css

ResponsiveStyle2Light.css

443 ms

modal.css

modal.css

354 ms

cookie-consent.css

cookie-consent.css

353 ms

jquery-3.6.0.js

jquery-3.6.0.js

38 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

354 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

354 ms

js.cookie-1.5.1.min.js

js.cookie-1.5.1.min.js

371 ms

jscript1.js

jscript1.js

439 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

437 ms

responsiveStyle2Seach.js

responsiveStyle2Seach.js

439 ms

covid-19.js

covid-19.js

439 ms

cookie-consent.js

cookie-consent.js

445 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

344 ms

tinymce.min.css

tinymce.min.css

522 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

523 ms

ticker-style.css

ticker-style.css

523 ms

jquery.ticker.js

jquery.ticker.js

523 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

525 ms

stickymenu.js

stickymenu.js

519 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

594 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

607 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

607 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

608 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

608 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

609 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

670 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

691 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

692 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

693 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

691 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

693 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

744 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

776 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

775 ms

element.js

element.js

50 ms

widget.js

widget.js

50 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

715 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

602 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

566 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

531 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

518 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

517 ms

slide2.js

slide2.js

516 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

517 ms

html5shiv.js

html5shiv.js

501 ms

nwmatcher-1.2.5-min.js

nwmatcher-1.2.5-min.js

463 ms

selectivizr-1.0.3b.js

selectivizr-1.0.3b.js

516 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

516 ms

rem.min.js

rem.min.js

517 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

512 ms

slide6.jpg

slide6.jpg

458 ms

4.Top%20banner.png

4.Top%20banner.png

349 ms

entrance.jpg

entrance.jpg

181 ms

Garstang%20Road%20(2).jpg

Garstang%20Road%20(2).jpg

181 ms

nhs_111.jpg

nhs_111.jpg

94 ms

nhs_logo.gif

nhs_logo.gif

93 ms

msw_logo.jpg

msw_logo.jpg

180 ms

Ubuntu-Regular.ttf

Ubuntu-Regular.ttf

389 ms

msw.woff

msw.woff

216 ms

msw.ttf

msw.ttf

223 ms

controls.png

controls.png

215 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

550 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

909 ms

slide8.jpg

slide8.jpg

297 ms

slide29.jpg

slide29.jpg

389 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

390 ms

Fotolia_15507297_Subscription_L.jpg

Fotolia_15507297_Subscription_L.jpg

466 ms

Fotolia_1611412_Subscription_L.jpg

Fotolia_1611412_Subscription_L.jpg

472 ms

cleanslate.css

cleanslate.css

7 ms

widget.css

widget.css

12 ms

location

location

18 ms

place

place

533 ms

widget-bg-bottom-left.png

widget-bg-bottom-left.png

66 ms

asset_cqclogo_update.png

asset_cqclogo_update.png

50 ms

cqc-widget-tick.png

cqc-widget-tick.png

51 ms

Userway.ashx

Userway.ashx

402 ms

widget-bg-top-right.png

widget-bg-top-right.png

9 ms

widget.js

widget.js

171 ms

js

js

47 ms

widget_app_base_1709133652771.js

widget_app_base_1709133652771.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk SEO score

68

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lythamroadsurgery.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lythamroadsurgery.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lythamroadsurgery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: