2.7 sec in total
123 ms
1.9 sec
670 ms
Visit lyveglobal.com now to see the best up-to-date Lyve Global content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lyveglobal.com
Lyve reimages logistics through advanced and agile solutions and technology innovations that connect organizations and opportunities.
Visit lyveglobal.comWe analyzed Lyveglobal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lyveglobal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value3,130 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value18.1 s
3/100
10%
123 ms
257 ms
102 ms
236 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Lyveglobal.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Px.ads.linkedin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 290.6 kB (33%)
871.1 kB
580.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lyveglobal.com main page is 871.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 374.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 275.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lyveglobal.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (83%)
102
17
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lyve Global. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lyveglobal.com
123 ms
lyveglobal.com
257 ms
gtm.js
102 ms
style-blocks.build.css
236 ms
style.min.css
58 ms
style-blocks.css
72 ms
grid-system.css
70 ms
style.css
61 ms
header-layout-centered-menu.css
68 ms
element-fancy-box.css
79 ms
owl-carousel.css
83 ms
responsive.css
83 ms
select2.css
87 ms
skin-material.css
88 ms
menu-dynamic.css
281 ms
front.min.css
131 ms
js_composer.min.css
131 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
133 ms
style.css
143 ms
stylesheet.css
150 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
76 ms
slick.min.css
91 ms
slick-theme.min.css
83 ms
rangeslider.min.css
88 ms
css
91 ms
jquery.min.js
148 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
149 ms
front.min.js
148 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
80 ms
font-awesome.min.css
138 ms
css
132 ms
frontend.min.css
137 ms
style-non-critical.css
135 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
136 ms
core.css
139 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
138 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
140 ms
dropzone.min.css
172 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
170 ms
dismiss.js
171 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
172 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
173 ms
priority.js
172 ms
intersection-observer.min.js
173 ms
transit.min.js
174 ms
slick.min.js
72 ms
rangeslider.min.js
108 ms
waypoints.js
174 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
132 ms
hoverintent.min.js
132 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
133 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
131 ms
anime.min.js
131 ms
superfish.js
120 ms
init.js
118 ms
touchswipe.min.js
117 ms
select2.min.js
116 ms
vivus.min.js
110 ms
lyve-script.js
71 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
67 ms
css2
53 ms
brave.js
59 ms
wpforms.min.js
61 ms
wpforms-conditional-logic-fields.min.js
59 ms
text-limit.es5.min.js
78 ms
jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js
81 ms
dropzone.min.js
79 ms
underscore.min.js
78 ms
wp-util.min.js
79 ms
wpforms-file-upload.es5.min.js
392 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
79 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
80 ms
mailcheck.min.js
79 ms
js
69 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
destination
125 ms
destination
192 ms
insight.min.js
53 ms
punycode.min.js
50 ms
utils.min.js
117 ms
collect
51 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
164 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
649 ms
collect
510 ms
Lyve_Logo.svg
75 ms
arrow-right-white.svg
76 ms
logo1.svg
484 ms
logo3.svg
71 ms
logo4.svg
77 ms
logo5.svg
79 ms
Mumzworld.svg
78 ms
Blooming-Box-1.svg
81 ms
PapaJohns.svg
82 ms
ZWZ-logo.svg
90 ms
Talabat.svg
86 ms
long-arrow-black-1.svg
84 ms
arrow-right-black.svg
88 ms
arrow-right-red.svg
95 ms
footer-logo-lyve.svg
97 ms
submit-spin.svg
99 ms
fbevents.js
433 ms
pd.js
434 ms
Mont-Regular.woff
348 ms
Mont-SemiBold.woff
348 ms
Mont-Bold.woff
425 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9TR_Q.ttf
423 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9TR_Q.ttf
426 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_m079TR_Q.ttf
518 ms
icomoon.woff
344 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
517 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
540 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
287 ms
analytics
52 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
258 ms
lyveglobal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lyveglobal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lyveglobal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lyveglobal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lyveglobal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lyveglobal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lyve Global. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: