Tools & Wizards About Us
lzpackaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lzpackaging.com

China Cosmetic Packaging, Acrylic Cosmetic Container Suppliers

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

226 ms

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

393 ms

lzpackaging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lzpackaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Lz Packaging content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lzpackaging.com

Yuyao Longzhuang Plastic Co., Ltd is China cosmetic packaging Supplier and Acrylic Cosmetic Container manufacturer, we wholesale plastic acrylic cosmetic container, jars, pumps etc.

Visit lzpackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lzpackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lzpackaging.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.495

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lzpackaging.com

226 ms

www.lzpackaging.com

760 ms

styles.css

474 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

442 ms

prettyPhoto.css

445 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Lzpackaging.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Player.polyv.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lzpackaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lzpackaging.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 128.4 kB
  • After minification 117.5 kB
  • After compression 37.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lz Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 192 B

  • Original 34.5 kB
  • After minification 34.5 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 47.4 kB

  • Original 165.9 kB
  • After minification 165.9 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lzpackaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (62%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lz Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lzpackaging.com

lzpackaging.com

226 ms

www.lzpackaging.com

www.lzpackaging.com

760 ms

styles.css

styles.css

474 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

wp-ulike.min.css

442 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

445 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

434 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

752 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

446 ms

basic.css

basic.css

857 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

864 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

870 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

871 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1111 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1210 ms

1013_361_.js

1013_361_.js

1283 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1450 ms

main.js

main.js

1296 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1290 ms

slick.js

slick.js

1606 ms

timber.scss.css

timber.scss.css

2009 ms

fonts.min.css

fonts.min.css

1775 ms

style.css

style.css

1805 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1735 ms

owl-carousel.css

owl-carousel.css

1870 ms

slick.scss.css

slick.scss.css

2066 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

2168 ms

flex-slider.css

flex-slider.css

2205 ms

styles.css

styles.css

2229 ms

js

js

84 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

2295 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

js-sdk-pro.min.js

87 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

2023 ms

player.js

player.js

367 ms

index_bot.js

index_bot.js

2480 ms

timber.js

timber.js

2556 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2583 ms

uisearch.js

uisearch.js

2624 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2647 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

2721 ms

public.css

public.css

2941 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3051 ms

wp-ulike.min.js

wp-ulike.min.js

2585 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

2611 ms

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

2619 ms

jquery.lightbox.min.js

jquery.lightbox.min.js

2708 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2940 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

2709 ms

jQuery.easing.min.js

jQuery.easing.min.js

2636 ms

js

js

92 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1219 ms

world_03.jpg

world_03.jpg

1347 ms

14.png

14.png

1344 ms

banner4-cn.jpg

banner4-cn.jpg

3977 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

2589 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

2584 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2324 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

3346 ms

h3-icon1.png

h3-icon1.png

1773 ms

h3-icon2.png

h3-icon2.png

2208 ms

h3-icon3.png

h3-icon3.png

2633 ms

h3-icon4.png

h3-icon4.png

3170 ms

222-4.jpg

222-4.jpg

3384 ms

left-img.jpg

left-img.jpg

3177 ms

deodorant-stick-5-1-1.jpg

deodorant-stick-5-1-1.jpg

3211 ms

LZ-8002-1-1.jpg

LZ-8002-1-1.jpg

3834 ms

LZ-8001-1-1-1.jpg

LZ-8001-1-1-1.jpg

3856 ms

LZ-8002-2-1.jpg

LZ-8002-2-1.jpg

3821 ms

0Y7A3180.jpg

0Y7A3180.jpg

4013 ms

2-5-1.jpg

2-5-1.jpg

3887 ms

LZ-6005.jpg

LZ-6005.jpg

4418 ms

polyvplayer.min.js

polyvplayer.min.js

25 ms

upgrade_flash_player.png

upgrade_flash_player.png

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4309 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4292 ms

BarlowSemiCondensed-Regular.ttf

BarlowSemiCondensed-Regular.ttf

4194 ms

deodorant-stick-2.jpg

deodorant-stick-2.jpg

4292 ms

snail-bottle-3.jpg

snail-bottle-3.jpg

4269 ms

square-8.jpg

square-8.jpg

4677 ms

qr.png

qr.png

4239 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

2544 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

650 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

659 ms

Accessibility Review

lzpackaging.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lzpackaging.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lzpackaging.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lzpackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lzpackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lzpackaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lz Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: