3 sec in total
84 ms
2.6 sec
326 ms
Click here to check amazing N Ladyclick content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about n.ladyclick.ru
Build beautiful, interactive forms — get more responses. No coding needed. Templates for quizzes, research, feedback, lead generation, and more. Sign up FREE.
Visit n.ladyclick.ruWe analyzed N.ladyclick.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
n.ladyclick.ru performance score
84 ms
155 ms
155 ms
37 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original N.ladyclick.ru, 12% (12 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net and 8% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (433 ms) relates to the external source Typeform.com.
Page size can be reduced by 473.4 kB (67%)
709.5 kB
236.1 kB
In fact, the total size of N.ladyclick.ru main page is 709.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 529.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 440.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 440.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 874 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, N Ladyclick needs image optimization as it can save up to 874 B or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. N.ladyclick.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (67%)
69
23
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of N Ladyclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.typeform.com
84 ms
profitwell.js
155 ms
gtm.js
155 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
37 ms
otSDKStub.js
85 ms
9208-a96b1afc58242d01.js
58 ms
9338-334e69e41cc6d9f4.js
57 ms
1581-4200fdf337759564.js
67 ms
379.7fbf04a2dd605d91.js
67 ms
8749-2fff2d2f1b7878c2.js
67 ms
6188.e2237c25396de0fa.js
72 ms
8766.1ac32fac1dd345c2.js
72 ms
4713-bb396b2ae1b6edb6.js
71 ms
8984-42545775df1e130c.js
73 ms
4091.14109f063fcf3a98.js
74 ms
2359.f27d47d37f310a53.js
74 ms
8121.e60edbd7e1d17327.js
77 ms
2382.c6e5c0d0bf19cbea.js
76 ms
79.0ccab93ea5972f3e.js
76 ms
8318.3a2380f30d8c7942.js
82 ms
5248.d8827ff5e70ab67a.js
78 ms
4533.803f763e85fe0d9d.js
78 ms
9216-f183394e990c6dcb.js
81 ms
8041.92edc26d0edb7ee3.js
81 ms
6512.1838b9e9c12de1e8.js
81 ms
webpack-f4a759335a4eb75b.js
108 ms
framework-3d0d1c881d45b3e2.js
109 ms
main-670790b90bc7f027.js
115 ms
_app-4abdd14affd05238.js
120 ms
5568-bc352803b391e7f6.js
114 ms
index-dd931f9398b43ff4.js
119 ms
_buildManifest.js
148 ms
_ssgManifest.js
145 ms
tools.svg
65 ms
font-subset.css
107 ms
airbnb-logo.svg
113 ms
mailchimp-logo.svg
114 ms
hermes-logo.svg
115 ms
hubspot-logo.svg
116 ms
barrys-logo.svg
117 ms
new.svg
54 ms
templates.svg
67 ms
templates-image.webp
68 ms
by-team.svg
80 ms
by-goal.svg
79 ms
by-workflow.svg
81 ms
integrations-image.webp
83 ms
support.svg
83 ms
company.svg
92 ms
blog.svg
83 ms
blog-image.webp
83 ms
zapier-logo.svg
111 ms
calendly-logo.svg
95 ms
hubspot-logo.svg
88 ms
slack-logo.svg
91 ms
notion-logo.svg
80 ms
dc37179a-4de5-4648-bd8f-2f087ec53cbd.json
64 ms
location
125 ms
js
114 ms
js
245 ms
analytics.js
359 ms
destination
193 ms
qOpeZycmzA2fE4wEzONYIUenJV0HKqsY7dzai25U_js.js
186 ms
otBannerSdk.js
118 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-english.woff
102 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-rest.woff
102 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin-extended-additional.woff
102 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin-extended-b.woff
167 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin-extended-a.woff
161 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin.woff
102 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-english.woff
104 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-rest.woff
103 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin-extended-additional.woff
103 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin-extended-b.woff
167 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin-extended-a.woff
167 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin.woff
168 ms
ApercuPro-Light-english.woff
168 ms
ApercuPro-Light-rest.woff
336 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin-extended-additional.woff
332 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin-extended-b.woff
331 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin-extended-a.woff
330 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin.woff
335 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-english.woff
334 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-rest.woff
335 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin-extended-additional.woff
336 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin-extended-b.woff
433 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin-extended-a.woff
432 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin.woff
335 ms
en.json
181 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin-extended-b.ttf
109 ms
ApercuPro-Regular-latin-extended-a.ttf
107 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin-extended-b.ttf
108 ms
ApercuPro-Medium-latin-extended-a.ttf
107 ms
collect
71 ms
collect
70 ms
otFlat.json
32 ms
otPcTab.json
47 ms
otCommonStyles.css
47 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin-extended-b.ttf
126 ms
ApercuPro-Light-latin-extended-a.ttf
126 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin-extended-b.ttf
99 ms
ApercuPro-Bold-latin-extended-a.ttf
17 ms
logo-black.png
28 ms
n.ladyclick.ru SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise N.ladyclick.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that N.ladyclick.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
n.ladyclick.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of N Ladyclick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: