Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

securessl.losethebackpain.com

LOSETHEBACKPAIN.COM - Back Pain, Neck Pain, Sciatica Relief

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

10 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

securessl.losethebackpain.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to securessl.losethebackpain.com homepage info - get ready to check Securessl LOSETHEBACKPAIN best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about securessl.losethebackpain.com

Find natural solutions to your pain problems. For nearly 20 years, the Healthy Back Institute has helped millions of people find lasting relief from pain

Visit securessl.losethebackpain.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securessl.losethebackpain.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securessl.losethebackpain.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

securessl.losethebackpain.com

10 ms

www.losethebackpain.com

7 ms

www.losethebackpain.com

17 ms

losethebackpain.com

374 ms

css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Securessl.losethebackpain.com, 56% (45 requests) were made to Losethebackpain.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to D3m9uo1vk58y2f.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (452 ms) relates to the external source Rum-static.pingdom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Securessl.losethebackpain.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 86.6 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 97.7 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 621 B

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Securessl LOSETHEBACKPAIN images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 453.8 kB
  • After minification 453.8 kB
  • After compression 450.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

  • Original 105.6 kB
  • After minification 90.1 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securessl.losethebackpain.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.5 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securessl LOSETHEBACKPAIN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

securessl.losethebackpain.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

securessl.losethebackpain.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

securessl.losethebackpain.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securessl.losethebackpain.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securessl.losethebackpain.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Securessl LOSETHEBACKPAIN. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: