5.3 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.6 sec
371 ms
Click here to check amazing Vpt Lrv content for Lithuania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vpt.lrv.lt
Viešųjų pirkimų tarnyba
Visit vpt.lrv.ltWe analyzed Vpt.lrv.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
vpt.lrv.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
1358 ms
23 ms
253 ms
504 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Vpt.lrv.lt, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Vpt.lrv.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (63%)
1.8 MB
653.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Vpt.lrv.lt main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 808.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.8 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vpt Lrv needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 594.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 594.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vpt.lrv.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (67%)
76
25
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vpt Lrv. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vpt.lrv.lt
1358 ms
css
23 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
253 ms
bootstrap.min.css
504 ms
font-awesome.min.css
375 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
262 ms
select2.css
389 ms
select2-bootstrap.css
377 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
391 ms
lightSlider.css
501 ms
screen.vpt.css
502 ms
audioplayer.css
518 ms
screen.css
951 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
898 ms
jquery.browser.min.js
517 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
863 ms
bootstrap.min.js
709 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
602 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
1055 ms
jquery-scrolltofixed-min.fix.js
727 ms
select2.min.js
1103 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
860 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
972 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
975 ms
ui.datepicker.php
980 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
1023 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1100 ms
jquery.fracs-0.15.0.min.js
1097 ms
imgLiquid-min.js
1104 ms
jquery.lightSlider.js
1150 ms
scripts.vpt.js
1178 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
1219 ms
audioplayer.fix.js
1235 ms
scripts.js
1236 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
956 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
1004 ms
css
20 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
125 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
128 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
130 ms
jquery.ui.button.css
132 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
134 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.css
173 ms
jquery.ui.menu.css
246 ms
jquery.ui.progressbar.css
251 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.css
251 ms
jquery.ui.selectable.css
259 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
262 ms
jquery.ui.spinner.css
297 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
366 ms
jquery.ui.tooltip.css
373 ms
print.css
231 ms
submit_cookies
241 ms
oldbrowser
235 ms
sprite.png
385 ms
lr_logo.png
228 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
191 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
192 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
192 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
192 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
534 ms
215_f8e507e3d7f6b27922838edcc12498d4.png
808 ms
212_274c72c94a69d6e93969110b8bdbbe50.jpg
619 ms
210_00c82ae5d68526d18b2a687a89f74302.jpg
368 ms
209_e4dda802776a4831a1f978db98eabbdf.jpg
383 ms
19_71d3d22d40725457c5a826ccb53174da.png
742 ms
10_15e9ea808531373587b733af25b4c243.png
616 ms
11_8afa285e665744033d7bda45ffc29de1.png
633 ms
12_0a101ca4a5f9aeea70c36e46dcb0bfce.png
660 ms
211_b199876936832a1afcd47490cbf6c43f.jpg
864 ms
14_3d94eae52f8af9f449402d7da6913092.png
749 ms
15_9d49cb48448f534e467b74045287fd9b.png
758 ms
es_banner.jpg
786 ms
copyright.png
872 ms
analytics.js
147 ms
icon_FF.png
677 ms
icon_Chr.png
683 ms
icon_Oper.png
710 ms
icon_Saf.png
727 ms
icon_IE.png
788 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
58 ms
vpt.lrv.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
vpt.lrv.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
vpt.lrv.lt SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LT
LT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vpt.lrv.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vpt.lrv.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vpt.lrv.lt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vpt Lrv. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: