Access web.liferay.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

web.liferay.com

348 ms

login

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Web.liferay.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (348 ms) belongs to the original domain Web.liferay.com.

Content Size

480.1 kB

After Optimization

466.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Web.liferay.com main page is 480.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 374.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 865 B

Original 1.9 kB
After minification 1.6 kB
After compression 1.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 319 B, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 865 B or 46% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 516 B

Original 374.5 kB
After minification 374.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Liferay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 78 B

Original 575 B
After minification 575 B
After compression 497 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78 B or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

Original 103.2 kB
After minification 103.2 kB
After compression 90.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web.liferay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web.liferay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web.liferay.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

web.liferay.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Liferay. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: