Tools & Wizards About Us
workclips.launchrock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

workclips.launchrock.com

Workclips | Fastest way to share project updates via short videos across geo-distributed teams

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

259 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

191 ms

workclips.launchrock.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to workclips.launchrock.com homepage info - get ready to check Workclips Launchrock best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about workclips.launchrock.com

Skip sharing status via conference calls or email! Use short videos to share your project updates. Highlight your best work within your team, company and also with your customers.

Visit workclips.launchrock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Workclips.launchrock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

workclips.launchrock.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

workclips.launchrock.com

259 ms

vendor-styles.css

11 ms

styles.css

3 ms

site.css

152 ms

dz4aen-pre-order.png

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Workclips.launchrock.com, 18% (4 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (270 ms) relates to the external source S3.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

413.4 kB

After Optimization

385.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Workclips.launchrock.com main page is 413.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 231.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 331 B

  • Original 231.3 kB
  • After minification 231.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Workclips Launchrock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 127.0 kB
  • After minification 127.0 kB
  • After compression 126.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Workclips.launchrock.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (45%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Workclips Launchrock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

workclips.launchrock.com

workclips.launchrock.com

259 ms

vendor-styles.css

vendor-styles.css

11 ms

styles.css

styles.css

3 ms

site.css

site.css

152 ms

dz4aen-pre-order.png

dz4aen-pre-order.png

270 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

172 ms

vendor-scripts.min.js

vendor-scripts.min.js

17 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

15 ms

lr-site.js

lr-site.js

15 ms

dkkguc-hr.png

dkkguc-hr.png

46 ms

css

css

16 ms

powered-by-launchrock.png

powered-by-launchrock.png

2 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

2 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

65 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

81 ms

53euqh-product-background.jpg

53euqh-product-background.jpg

94 ms

x5vpfq-mug.jpg

x5vpfq-mug.jpg

57 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

21 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

js

js

98 ms

Accessibility Review

workclips.launchrock.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

workclips.launchrock.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

workclips.launchrock.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workclips.launchrock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Workclips.launchrock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

workclips.launchrock.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Workclips Launchrock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: