Tools & Wizards About Us
ww2.lifeplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 66

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

ww2.lifeplus.com

At Lifeplus, wellbeing is in our DNA

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

350 ms

ww2.lifeplus.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ww2.lifeplus.com now to see the best up-to-date Ww 2 Lifeplus content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ww2.lifeplus.com

At Lifeplus, we have devoted decades to combining science and nature to bring innovative dietary and health supplements, information and advice to people in every walk of life.

Visit ww2.lifeplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ww2.lifeplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ww2.lifeplus.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

en

1116 ms

style2.css

339 ms

slideshow.css

281 ms

xigen.css

286 ms

fonts.css

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ww2.lifeplus.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Account.psplugin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Ww1.lifeplus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 414.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ww2.lifeplus.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 961.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 266.0 kB

  • Original 321.7 kB
  • After minification 288.3 kB
  • After compression 55.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 266.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 102.8 kB

  • Original 961.7 kB
  • After minification 858.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ww 2 Lifeplus needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 335.9 kB
  • After minification 330.8 kB
  • After compression 301.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 48.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ww2.lifeplus.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (43%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ww 2 Lifeplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

en

en

1116 ms

style2.css

style2.css

339 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

281 ms

xigen.css

xigen.css

286 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

312 ms

breakpoints.css

breakpoints.css

315 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

452 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

661 ms

mobile.js

mobile.js

566 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

596 ms

makeslideshows.js

makeslideshows.js

593 ms

xigen.js

xigen.js

588 ms

timezone_conversions.js

timezone_conversions.js

730 ms

script.js

script.js

904 ms

site_login.js

site_login.js

740 ms

scrub_addresses.js

scrub_addresses.js

774 ms

statecodes.js

statecodes.js

775 ms

error-trapper.js

error-trapper.js

842 ms

community_popups.js

community_popups.js

880 ms

confirm_order_popups.js

confirm_order_popups.js

1021 ms

testaccounts.js

testaccounts.js

1025 ms

standard.css

standard.css

950 ms

api.js

api.js

31 ms

Small_Left.png

Small_Left.png

286 ms

cart.svg

cart.svg

314 ms

world.svg

world.svg

378 ms

language.svg

language.svg

505 ms

logo.png

logo.png

500 ms

lp_loading_graphic.gif

lp_loading_graphic.gif

532 ms

arrow1.svg

arrow1.svg

535 ms

home_happy_people.jpg

home_happy_people.jpg

662 ms

home_spices.jpg

home_spices.jpg

945 ms

home_solis.jpg

home_solis.jpg

839 ms

home_pills.jpg

home_pills.jpg

1062 ms

home_superfoods.jpg

home_superfoods.jpg

1253 ms

home_weight_balance.jpg

home_weight_balance.jpg

1053 ms

home_skin_care.jpg

home_skin_care.jpg

1234 ms

home_sports_nutrition.jpg

home_sports_nutrition.jpg

1307 ms

home_dietary_needs.jpg

home_dietary_needs.jpg

1422 ms

homepic_quality1.png

homepic_quality1.png

1309 ms

homepic_quality2.png

homepic_quality2.png

1312 ms

homepic_quality3.png

homepic_quality3.png

1544 ms

logo_footer_white.png

logo_footer_white.png

1534 ms

Seldia-Logo_footer.png

Seldia-Logo_footer.png

1558 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

1560 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

1592 ms

vimeo-icon.png

vimeo-icon.png

1672 ms

instagram-icon.png

instagram-icon.png

1786 ms

youtube-icon.png

youtube-icon.png

1809 ms

pinterest-icon.png

pinterest-icon.png

1822 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

1813 ms

engage.js

engage.js

868 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

41 ms

Accessibility Review

ww2.lifeplus.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ww2.lifeplus.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ww2.lifeplus.com SEO score

66

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ww2.lifeplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ww2.lifeplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ww2.lifeplus.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ww 2 Lifeplus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: