Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

blog.mjam.net

Foodora Food Blog

Page Load Speed

8.4 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

336 ms

blog.mjam.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to blog.mjam.net homepage info - get ready to check Blog Mjam best content for Austria right away, or after learning these important things about blog.mjam.net

Willkommen auf dem Food Blog von Foodora! ✓ Unterhaltsames und Wissenswertes rund um das Thema Food ✓ Aktuelle Aktionen ✓ Neuigkeiten | Foodora Food Blog

Visit blog.mjam.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Blog.mjam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blog.mjam.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

blog.mjam.net

2085 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

css

25 ms

main.min.css

430 ms

font-awesome.min.css

217 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Blog.mjam.net, 17% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Iconosquare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (48%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Blog.mjam.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 75.5 kB

  • Original 101.0 kB
  • After minification 99.9 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Mjam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 385.5 kB

  • Original 585.0 kB
  • After minification 583.0 kB
  • After compression 199.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 385.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 148.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.mjam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (43%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Mjam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

blog.mjam.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

blog.mjam.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

blog.mjam.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.mjam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.mjam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Mjam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: