Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

Page Load Speed

263 ms in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

156 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

bugs.matricom.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bugs.matricom.net homepage info - get ready to check Bugs Matricom best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bugs.matricom.net

Visit bugs.matricom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bugs.matricom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 216 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bugs.matricom.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bugs.matricom.net

47 ms

bugs.matricom.net

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bugs.matricom.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (88 ms) belongs to the original domain Bugs.matricom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.1 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Bugs.matricom.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bugs Matricom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 234.2 kB
  • After minification 234.1 kB
  • After compression 220.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 326.2 kB
  • After minification 326.2 kB
  • After compression 309.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bugs.matricom.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

bugs.matricom.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

bugs.matricom.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

bugs.matricom.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bugs.matricom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bugs.matricom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bugs Matricom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: