Tools & Wizards About Us
jw.marriott.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

jw.marriott.com

Luxury Hotels & Resorts: Mindful Experiences | JW Marriott

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

143 ms

jw.marriott.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jw.marriott.com now to see the best up-to-date JW Marriott content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jw.marriott.com

Discover classic luxury in JW Marriott hotels, with mindful experiences and inspiring spaces to improve your well-being and enrich your mind, body and soul.

Visit jw.marriott.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jw.marriott.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jw.marriott.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,560 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jw.marriott.com

129 ms

www.jw.marriott.com

35 ms

jw-marriott.marriott.com

134 ms

style.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jw.marriott.com, 72% (38 requests) were made to Jw-marriott.marriott.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to Pacsys.marriott.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (143 ms) relates to the external source Jw-marriott.marriott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

657.5 kB

After Optimization

532.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jw.marriott.com main page is 657.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 453.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

  • Original 134.9 kB
  • After minification 108.7 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 856 B

  • Original 453.5 kB
  • After minification 453.5 kB
  • After compression 452.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 69.1 kB
  • After minification 69.1 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jw.marriott.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (95%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JW Marriott. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jw.marriott.com

jw.marriott.com

129 ms

www.jw.marriott.com

www.jw.marriott.com

35 ms

jw-marriott.marriott.com

jw-marriott.marriott.com

134 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

48 ms

css

css

64 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

53 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

51 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

55 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

55 ms

jw.css

jw.css

85 ms

image-renderer.css

image-renderer.css

61 ms

styles.css

styles.css

68 ms

style.css

style.css

61 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

66 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

78 ms

autop.min.js

autop.min.js

61 ms

blob.min.js

blob.min.js

72 ms

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

143 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

77 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

137 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

135 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

135 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

136 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

138 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

139 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

136 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

138 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

138 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

139 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

140 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

140 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

139 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

138 ms

blocks.min.js

blocks.min.js

140 ms

js

js

134 ms

pacsys.esm.js

pacsys.esm.js

130 ms

pacsys.js

pacsys.js

129 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

140 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

139 ms

launch-EN3963523be4674e5591a9c4d516697352.min.js

launch-EN3963523be4674e5591a9c4d516697352.min.js

133 ms

jquery.wp-smartcrop.min.js

jquery.wp-smartcrop.min.js

136 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

137 ms

css

css

26 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

21 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

15 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

22 ms

proxima-nova-regular.otf

proxima-nova-regular.otf

25 ms

ProximaNovaRegular.otf

ProximaNovaRegular.otf

26 ms

proxima-nova-bold.otf

proxima-nova-bold.otf

13 ms

AvenirLTStd-Book.otf

AvenirLTStd-Book.otf

44 ms

proxima-nova-semibold.otf

proxima-nova-semibold.otf

25 ms

ProximaNovaSemibold.otf

ProximaNovaSemibold.otf

25 ms

Accessibility Review

jw.marriott.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

jw.marriott.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jw.marriott.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jw.marriott.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jw.marriott.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jw.marriott.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: