Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

m-on.press

THE FIRST TIMES

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

687 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

819 ms

m-on.press screenshot

About Website

Visit m-on.press now to see the best up-to-date M On content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about m-on.press

「THE FIRST TAKE」が手掛けるプラットフォーム「THE FIRST TIMES」。初めての緊張、初めての驚き、初めての感動、初めての喜び、初めての気づき、初めての学び…ここから、次々と"初めて"の音楽体験をお届けしていきます。

Visit m-on.press

Key Findings

We analyzed M-on.press page load time and found that the first response time was 687 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

m-on.press performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

m-on.press

687 ms

www.m-on.press

1111 ms

style.css

1198 ms

font-awesome.css

5 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

1330 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original M-on.press, 9% (10 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain M-on.press.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 360.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

In fact, the total size of M-on.press main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 55.6 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M On images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 173.6 kB

  • Original 330.6 kB
  • After minification 328.1 kB
  • After compression 157.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.6 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M-on.press needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (38%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

65

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M On. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

m-on.press accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

m-on.press best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

m-on.press SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M-on.press can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that M-on.press main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of M On. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: