Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

machinarium.com

Machinarium – Amanita Design

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

208 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

798 ms

machinarium.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to machinarium.com homepage info - get ready to check Machinarium best content right away, or after learning these important things about machinarium.com

Machinarium – Puzzle Adventure Game – Amanita Design

Visit machinarium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Machinarium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

machinarium.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

machinarium.com

208 ms

machinarium.net

201 ms

machinarium.net

368 ms

machinarium.html

370 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Machinarium.com, 65% (26 requests) were made to Amanita-design.net and 13% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (745 ms) relates to the external source Amanita-design.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Machinarium.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 725.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 60.9 kB
  • After minification 54.4 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 725.6 kB
  • After minification 725.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Machinarium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 285.6 kB
  • After minification 285.6 kB
  • After compression 266.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 151.1 kB
  • After minification 119.7 kB
  • After compression 95.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Machinarium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (48%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Machinarium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

machinarium.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

machinarium.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

machinarium.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Machinarium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Machinarium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Machinarium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: