Tools & Wizards About Us
machinery-onq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

machinery-onq.com

Machinery-onQ | Trading platform for new, used and rental mobile machinery

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

450 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

88 ms

machinery-onq.com screenshot

About Website

Visit machinery-onq.com now to see the best up-to-date Machinery OnQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about machinery-onq.com

Machinery-onQ.com is the platform to buy and sell industrial equipment such as forklifts, pallet stackers, order pickers, container handlers, aerial work platforms, tow trucks, industrial sweepers and...

Visit machinery-onq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Machinery-onq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 450 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

machinery-onq.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.63

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

machinery-onq.com

450 ms

www.machinery-onq.com

1014 ms

americas.machinery-onq.com

1276 ms

bootstrap.min.css

446 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

671 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Machinery-onq.com, 97% (63 requests) were made to Americas.machinery-onq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Americas.machinery-onq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 223.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

620.2 kB

After Optimization

397.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Machinery-onq.com main page is 620.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 365.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 128.6 kB
  • After minification 117.0 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Machinery OnQ needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 87.6 kB

  • Original 365.7 kB
  • After minification 365.5 kB
  • After compression 278.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.6 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 72.6 kB
  • After minification 72.6 kB
  • After compression 53.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Machinery-onq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (87%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Machinery OnQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

machinery-onq.com

machinery-onq.com

450 ms

www.machinery-onq.com

www.machinery-onq.com

1014 ms

americas.machinery-onq.com

americas.machinery-onq.com

1276 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

446 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

671 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

867 ms

bootstrap-datepicker3.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker3.min.css

871 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

873 ms

hopscotch.min.css

hopscotch.min.css

870 ms

bootstrap-fixes.min.css

bootstrap-fixes.min.css

887 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

898 ms

social-icons.min.css

social-icons.min.css

1124 ms

ast

ast

1127 ms

fat-executeWhenReady.min.js

fat-executeWhenReady.min.js

1124 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

1264 ms

jquery.pjax.min.js

jquery.pjax.min.js

910 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

924 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

1283 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

1282 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1288 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

1288 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

1288 ms

bootstrap-toolkit.min.js

bootstrap-toolkit.min.js

1685 ms

moment-with-locales.min.js

moment-with-locales.min.js

2133 ms

ScrollEvents.min.js

ScrollEvents.min.js

1688 ms

URI.min.js

URI.min.js

1689 ms

jquery.URI.min.js

jquery.URI.min.js

1687 ms

withinViewport.min.js

withinViewport.min.js

1688 ms

jquery.withinViewport.min.js

jquery.withinViewport.min.js

1900 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

1901 ms

pace.min.js

pace.min.js

1908 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

1902 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1907 ms

equalize.min.js

equalize.min.js

2116 ms

hopscotch.min.js

hopscotch.min.js

2121 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

2120 ms

Chart.min.js

Chart.min.js

2458 ms

stickyfill.min.js

stickyfill.min.js

2129 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

2482 ms

fat-alytics.min.js

fat-alytics.min.js

2253 ms

fat-banner.min.js

fat-banner.min.js

2033 ms

fat-validation.min.js

fat-validation.min.js

1839 ms

fat-dialog-box.min.js

fat-dialog-box.min.js

1836 ms

fat-ajax-form.min.js

fat-ajax-form.min.js

2030 ms

fat-modal-ajax-form.min.js

fat-modal-ajax-form.min.js

2028 ms

fat-results-pager.min.js

fat-results-pager.min.js

2017 ms

fat-timeDisplay.min.js

fat-timeDisplay.min.js

2010 ms

fat-enquiry.min.js

fat-enquiry.min.js

1783 ms

fat-toggle-filter.min.js

fat-toggle-filter.min.js

1783 ms

fat-statistic-summary.min.js

fat-statistic-summary.min.js

1998 ms

fat-chart.min.js

fat-chart.min.js

1979 ms

validate.min.js

validate.min.js

1908 ms

fat-validatejs-validators.min.js

fat-validatejs-validators.min.js

1626 ms

fat-sharer.min.js

fat-sharer.min.js

1624 ms

knockout-3.5.0.js

knockout-3.5.0.js

1635 ms

knockout.mapping-latest.js

knockout.mapping-latest.js

1833 ms

ko.bindingHandlers.min.js

ko.bindingHandlers.min.js

1834 ms

NewSearchManager.min.js

NewSearchManager.min.js

1821 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1663 ms

onQ-mach-367x120.jpg

onQ-mach-367x120.jpg

1442 ms

onQ-mach-306x100.jpg

onQ-mach-306x100.jpg

1496 ms

onQ-mach-245x80.jpg

onQ-mach-245x80.jpg

1648 ms

FLA-logo-178x60.png

FLA-logo-178x60.png

1647 ms

mheda-logo-176x60.jpg

mheda-logo-176x60.jpg

1436 ms

ichca-logo-116x60.jpg

ichca-logo-116x60.jpg

1436 ms

Accessibility Review

machinery-onq.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

machinery-onq.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

machinery-onq.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Machinery-onq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Machinery-onq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

machinery-onq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Machinery OnQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: