8.2 sec in total
173 ms
7.2 sec
862 ms
Click here to check amazing Magenium content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about magenium.com
We focus on bringing value and solve business challenges through the delivery of modern IT services and solutions
Visit magenium.comWe analyzed Magenium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
magenium.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
15/100
10%
Value8.7 s
2/100
25%
Value10.8 s
7/100
10%
Value2,170 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value17.4 s
5/100
10%
173 ms
142 ms
237 ms
57 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Magenium.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 559.9 kB (22%)
2.5 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Magenium.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magenium images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 346.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magenium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 346.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (62%)
82
31
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magenium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
magenium.com
173 ms
www.magenium.com
142 ms
www.magenium.com
237 ms
djdht.css
57 ms
djdoi.css
67 ms
style.css
52 ms
djdht.js
53 ms
CDWidget.js
145 ms
live-search.js
136 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
131 ms
core.min.js
129 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
128 ms
comment-reply.min.js
128 ms
popper.min.js
133 ms
bootstrap.js
135 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
134 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
134 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
142 ms
jquery.matchHeight.min.js
151 ms
modernizr.js
151 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
151 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
152 ms
theme.js
149 ms
theme-async.js
163 ms
jquery.vide.min.js
161 ms
countup.min.js
238 ms
countup-loader.min.js
161 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
160 ms
css
111 ms
gtm.js
205 ms
webfont.js
138 ms
fscript.js
2614 ms
90o4-3UOiXU
239 ms
dots-background-2.png
1712 ms
Magenium_Powered_by_AVI.jpg
174 ms
consulting.png
939 ms
managed_services.png
114 ms
2022_best_places_to_work.png
112 ms
harddrive.png
178 ms
timothy-muza-6VjPmyMj5KM-unsplash-640x427.jpg
173 ms
123-640x622.png
179 ms
blog_header_seo_0.jpg
176 ms
outlook_0-640x499.png
181 ms
jeff_4-300x300.jpg
179 ms
LI-In-Bug-300x255.png
180 ms
scot.png
183 ms
Peggy20Martinus202015-300x300.jpg
186 ms
Beth-Fischer-1-300x300.jpg
183 ms
Tom-Egan-2017-300x300.jpg
185 ms
Steve-Wrenn-300x300.png
186 ms
Microsoft_Gold_Partner-300x128.jpg
187 ms
it-puzzle.png
2479 ms
porto.woff
822 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
828 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
822 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
747 ms
css
117 ms
www-player.css
963 ms
www-embed-player.js
1433 ms
base.js
3443 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
712 ms
conversion_async.js
2402 ms
iframe_api
1349 ms
ts.js
2392 ms
3w28dhlohf
2392 ms
js
1344 ms
analytics.js
2016 ms
cdform.jquery.js
3282 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
1863 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
1865 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
3131 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
3122 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
3152 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
3151 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
3152 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqs.woff
3152 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqs.woff
3154 ms
www-widgetapi.js
877 ms
BPTW22-3.jpg
1434 ms
clarity.js
963 ms
collect
870 ms
1124 ms
tsr.js
652 ms
90o4-3UOiXU
658 ms
collect
788 ms
base.js
494 ms
cdform.min.js
692 ms
jquery.dropdown.js
692 ms
jquery.dropdown.css
692 ms
923 ms
ga-audiences
963 ms
ad_status.js
574 ms
cdform2.min.css
281 ms
xkapkqueeeipwaanojrl8g.js
423 ms
VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js
127 ms
embed.js
46 ms
id
197 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
191 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
189 ms
forms.js
38 ms
Create
41 ms
c.gif
49 ms
magenium.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
magenium.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
magenium.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magenium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Magenium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
magenium.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Magenium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: