Tools & Wizards About Us
magicpr.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

magicpr.net

Press Release Syndication + Digital PR and SEO Link Building Service -

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

316 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

magicpr.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to magicpr.net homepage info - get ready to check Magic PR best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about magicpr.net

Visit magicpr.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Magicpr.net page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

magicpr.net performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

magicpr.net

316 ms

magicpr.com

853 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

fyaow.css

365 ms

css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Magicpr.net, 53% (26 requests) were made to Magicpr.com and 29% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (853 ms) relates to the external source Magicpr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Magicpr.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 34.1 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magic PR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 398.8 kB
  • After minification 398.8 kB
  • After compression 396.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 499 B

  • Original 152.5 kB
  • After minification 152.5 kB
  • After compression 152.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magicpr.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magic PR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

magicpr.net

magicpr.net

316 ms

magicpr.com

magicpr.com

853 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

fyaow.css

fyaow.css

365 ms

css

css

46 ms

all.css

all.css

51 ms

a1pd2.js

a1pd2.js

351 ms

api.js

api.js

68 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

53 ms

a1pd2.js

a1pd2.js

260 ms

h6bnu.css

h6bnu.css

345 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

582 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

262 ms

common.js

common.js

346 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

350 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

483 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

487 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

92 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

logo_white.png

logo_white.png

131 ms

homepage-hero-v5.jpg

homepage-hero-v5.jpg

301 ms

yahoo_finance_hp.png

yahoo_finance_hp.png

130 ms

msn_hp.png

msn_hp.png

132 ms

business_insider_hp.png

business_insider_hp.png

273 ms

globenewswire_hp.png

globenewswire_hp.png

273 ms

associated_press_hp.png

associated_press_hp.png

272 ms

digital_journal_hp.png

digital_journal_hp.png

273 ms

marketwatch_hp.png

marketwatch_hp.png

273 ms

newsmax_hp.png

newsmax_hp.png

363 ms

benzinga_hp.png

benzinga_hp.png

363 ms

pr360_t-1.png

pr360_t-1.png

595 ms

pr_logo.png

pr_logo.png

686 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

66 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

81 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

88 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

91 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

91 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

91 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf

91 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

89 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

91 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e0.ttf

198 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

198 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

220 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e0.ttf

198 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

377 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

js

js

202 ms

Accessibility Review

magicpr.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

magicpr.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

magicpr.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magicpr.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Magicpr.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

magicpr.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Magic PR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: