5.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.4 sec
97 ms
Welcome to magpeya.nl homepage info - get ready to check Magpeya best content right away, or after learning these important things about magpeya.nl
Visit magpeya.nlWe analyzed Magpeya.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
magpeya.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.0 s
0/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
1110 ms
279 ms
544 ms
328 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Magpeya.nl, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Magpeya.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (73%)
1.4 MB
379.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Magpeya.nl main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 734.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magpeya images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 354.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 354.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 646.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magpeya.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 646.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)
45
5
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magpeya. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
magpeya.nl
1110 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
279 ms
style.min.css
544 ms
classic-themes.min.css
328 ms
all.min.css
465 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
328 ms
style.min.css
618 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
448 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
569 ms
swiper.min.css
451 ms
post-7.css
556 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
554 ms
global.css
781 ms
post-28.css
575 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
767 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
677 ms
page-transitions.min.js
716 ms
animations.min.css
617 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
623 ms
theme.min.js
752 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
754 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
757 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
758 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
774 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
791 ms
ow-slider.min.js
797 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
829 ms
scroll-top.min.js
831 ms
select.min.js
831 ms
instant-page.min.js
891 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
896 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
909 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
934 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
952 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
956 ms
hooks.min.js
993 ms
i18n.min.js
1003 ms
frontend.min.js
927 ms
waypoints.min.js
890 ms
core.min.js
837 ms
frontend.min.js
722 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
750 ms
BG-Circle-Swirl.svg
404 ms
Magpeya.png
517 ms
mag-copy.png
424 ms
6qLVKYkHvh-nlUpKPAdoVFBtfxDzIn1eCzpB22cc8gasUp8.ttf
41 ms
6qLVKYkHvh-nlUpKPAdoVFBtfxDzIn1eCzpB22ck8AasUp8.ttf
100 ms
6qLVKYkHvh-nlUpKPAdoVFBtfxDzIn1eCzpB22dU9AasUp8.ttf
79 ms
6qLQKYkHvh-nlUpKPAdoVFBtfxDzIn1eCzpB22-n1xY.ttf
106 ms
6qLVKYkHvh-nlUpKPAdoVFBtfxDzIn1eCzpB22cM9QasUp8.ttf
83 ms
uU9MCBoQ4YOqOW1boAP2-vQ.ttf
106 ms
magpeya.nl accessibility score
magpeya.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
magpeya.nl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magpeya.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Magpeya.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
magpeya.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Magpeya. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: