Tools & Wizards About Us
magpile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 39

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

magpile.com

Discover magazines - Magpile

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

306 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

magpile.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Magpile content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about magpile.com

Discover mags, cover to cover.

Visit magpile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Magpile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 306 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

magpile.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,400 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

magpile.com

306 ms

magpile.com

1628 ms

css

31 ms

store-shared.css

518 ms

style.css

755 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Magpile.com, 34% (15 requests) were made to Media.magpile.com and 30% (13 requests) were made to Static.magpile.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Magpile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 391.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Magpile.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 974.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 72.5 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 259 B

  • Original 974.4 kB
  • After minification 974.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magpile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 239.8 kB

  • Original 533.1 kB
  • After minification 457.5 kB
  • After compression 293.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 239.8 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 89.6 kB

  • Original 106.4 kB
  • After minification 76.7 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magpile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magpile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

magpile.com

magpile.com

306 ms

magpile.com

magpile.com

1628 ms

css

css

31 ms

store-shared.css

store-shared.css

518 ms

style.css

style.css

755 ms

R5bt2MeJ3MsnJLeu_200x0.png

R5bt2MeJ3MsnJLeu_200x0.png

694 ms

home-edit.png

home-edit.png

576 ms

pER4hciNkmICTE1t_200x0.jpg

pER4hciNkmICTE1t_200x0.jpg

626 ms

XyBWZQThsYkpTyF3_200x0.jpg

XyBWZQThsYkpTyF3_200x0.jpg

634 ms

FDCw7eB1SQi70Zg9_200x0.jpg

FDCw7eB1SQi70Zg9_200x0.jpg

643 ms

1EJ1Xb9BKsH2eHFd_200x0.jpg

1EJ1Xb9BKsH2eHFd_200x0.jpg

653 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

567 ms

hOWju7sb8LF1JIXY_400x0.jpg

hOWju7sb8LF1JIXY_400x0.jpg

854 ms

AWFIcoRuldhyH45Z_400x0.png

AWFIcoRuldhyH45Z_400x0.png

1102 ms

cFK1WJPt9KgMzOYQ_400x0.jpeg

cFK1WJPt9KgMzOYQ_400x0.jpeg

821 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

868 ms

all.js

all.js

730 ms

store-shared.js

store-shared.js

616 ms

ads.js

ads.js

518 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

80 ms

share.js

share.js

20 ms

T5G00AXL0G5GKP5K34.js

T5G00AXL0G5GKP5K34.js

221 ms

api.js

api.js

45 ms

default_73x73.jpg

default_73x73.jpg

645 ms

1709-danhowarth_73x73.jpg

1709-danhowarth_73x73.jpg

655 ms

xMnYRLdQrQW53ISn_200x0.jpg

xMnYRLdQrQW53ISn_200x0.jpg

729 ms

pxSIRQcndJaQ5Nxi_200x0.png

pxSIRQcndJaQ5Nxi_200x0.png

935 ms

lfprugsaQSGEjIzM_200x0.png

lfprugsaQSGEjIzM_200x0.png

951 ms

AcoXFrN7vt0jqZ01_200x0.jpg

AcoXFrN7vt0jqZ01_200x0.jpg

786 ms

logo-header.png

logo-header.png

95 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

94 ms

home-covers.jpg

home-covers.jpg

237 ms

home-community.jpg

home-community.jpg

237 ms

home-search.jpg

home-search.jpg

111 ms

font

font

17 ms

ga.js

ga.js

44 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

73 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

97 ms

font

font

15 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

42 ms

messenger.css

messenger.css

41 ms

messenger.js

messenger.js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

magpile.com accessibility score

39

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

magpile.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

magpile.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magpile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Magpile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

magpile.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Magpile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: