33.1 sec in total
995 ms
28 sec
4.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Mailmarks content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mailmarks.com
Send Online Email Marketing Newsletters, Bulk Emails effectively and Promote your Products and Services
Visit mailmarks.comWe analyzed Mailmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 995 ms and then it took 32.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
mailmarks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value24.3 s
0/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.642
9/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
995 ms
474 ms
619 ms
1990 ms
1802 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Mailmarks.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Mailmarks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 166.4 kB (19%)
878.7 kB
712.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Mailmarks.com main page is 878.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 508.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mailmarks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.9 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)
39
15
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailmarks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mailmarks.com
995 ms
index.asp
474 ms
bootstrap.min.css
619 ms
main.css
1990 ms
supersized.css
1802 ms
supersized.shutter.css
1813 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1802 ms
fonts.css
1803 ms
shortcodes.css
1681 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
1877 ms
responsive.css
1994 ms
modernizr.js
2034 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
14613 ms
jssor.js
4450 ms
jssor.slider.js
5217 ms
gen_validatorv31.js
8151 ms
jquery.min.js
12 ms
bootstrap.min.js
4112 ms
supersized.3.2.7.min.js
2071 ms
waypoints.js
2293 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
2510 ms
jquery.isotope.js
5379 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
4320 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
7221 ms
jquery.tweet.js
5989 ms
plugins.js
5255 ms
main.js
5462 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
menu-mobile.png
11074 ms
logo.png
227 ms
banner11.jpg
11078 ms
img1.png
11700 ms
banner6.jpg
11307 ms
banner10.jpg
4766 ms
phone.png
11093 ms
email.png
11092 ms
support.png
11848 ms
Titillium-Regular-webfont.ttf
11290 ms
loading.gif
11393 ms
b21.png
11851 ms
a21.png
11868 ms
ChatLink.ashx
404 ms
collect
127 ms
Icons.woff
11505 ms
progress.gif
11666 ms
image04.jpg
11554 ms
image01.jpg
11650 ms
image02.jpg
11763 ms
placeholder.js
11855 ms
mailmarks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
mailmarks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mailmarks.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mailmarks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mailmarks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: