Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

mailpop.in

Mailpopin - Supercharge your Stripe notifications with contextual metadata. Finally receive useful information by email each time a new payment has be...

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

278 ms

mailpop.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mailpop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mailpop.in

Supercharge your Stripe notifications with contextual metadata. Finally receive useful information by email each time a new payment has been successful on Stripe!

Visit mailpop.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Mailpop.in page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mailpop.in performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.183

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mailpop.in

252 ms

main.css

186 ms

before.png

413 ms

after.png

440 ms

main.js

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Mailpop.in, 22% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Browser-update.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) relates to the external source Linkedin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

440.8 kB

After Optimization

415.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Mailpop.in main page is 440.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 431.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 431.1 kB
  • After minification 411.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mailpop images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailpop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mailpop.in accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mailpop.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mailpop.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailpop.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Mailpop.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mailpop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: