Tools & Wizards About Us
mailstronger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

mailstronger.com

MailStronger - Emailing Solution, Email Marketing Campaigns, Transactional Email, SMS

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

549 ms

mailstronger.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mail Stronger content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mailstronger.com

Envoyez vos campagnes emailing, sms, facilement avec MailStronger. La solution emailing tout-en-un. Essayez gratuitement notre solution !

Visit mailstronger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mailstronger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mailstronger.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.5 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mailstronger.com

2203 ms

bootstrap.css

616 ms

stack-interface.css

309 ms

socicon.css

311 ms

lightbox.min.css

311 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Mailstronger.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mailstronger.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (53%)

Content Size

7.1 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mailstronger.com main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.9 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mail Stronger needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 998.7 kB
  • After compression 452.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 337.0 kB

  • Original 397.5 kB
  • After minification 315.8 kB
  • After compression 60.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailstronger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (80%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mail Stronger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mailstronger.com

mailstronger.com

2203 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

616 ms

stack-interface.css

stack-interface.css

309 ms

socicon.css

socicon.css

311 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

311 ms

flickity.css

flickity.css

312 ms

iconsmind.css

iconsmind.css

610 ms

theme.css

theme.css

918 ms

custom.css

custom.css

411 ms

theme2.css

theme2.css

412 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

618 ms

responsive-pricing.css

responsive-pricing.css

515 ms

css

css

50 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

51 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

60 ms

api.js

api.js

60 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

862 ms

js

js

84 ms

js

js

129 ms

gtag.js

gtag.js

615 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

10 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

17 ms

language.js

language.js

412 ms

angular.js

angular.js

1132 ms

angular-sanitize.js

angular-sanitize.js

521 ms

angular-storage.min.js

angular-storage.min.js

420 ms

auth.js

auth.js

515 ms

flickity.min.js

flickity.min.js

777 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

768 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

768 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

776 ms

ytplayer.min.js

ytplayer.min.js

775 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

776 ms

granim.min.js

granim.min.js

775 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

884 ms

twitterfetcher.min.js

twitterfetcher.min.js

883 ms

spectragram.min.js

spectragram.min.js

885 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

884 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1081 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

11 ms

smsprice.js

smsprice.js

983 ms

toggle.js

toggle.js

983 ms

google-analytics.js

google-analytics.js

981 ms

pop.js

pop.js

981 ms

sujet.js

sujet.js

1086 ms

mail.js

mail.js

1084 ms

typ.js

typ.js

1082 ms

message.js

message.js

1081 ms

facebook.js

facebook.js

1190 ms

contact.js

contact.js

1191 ms

inscrit.js

inscrit.js

1090 ms

form.js

form.js

1090 ms

mail.js

mail.js

987 ms

mdpf.js

mdpf.js

948 ms

modal.js

modal.js

975 ms

home.js

home.js

980 ms

ip.js

ip.js

980 ms

sms.js

sms.js

890 ms

email.js

email.js

881 ms

jquery.creditCardValidator.js

jquery.creditCardValidator.js

828 ms

payment.js

payment.js

877 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

193 ms

l.js

l.js

232 ms

logomail2.png

logomail2.png

1134 ms

mailstronger-bann1.png

mailstronger-bann1.png

2058 ms

switzerland.png

switzerland.png

710 ms

font

font

115 ms

iconsmind.woff

iconsmind.woff

1551 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

21 ms

stack-interface.woff

stack-interface.woff

703 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

754 ms

Flat-Web-Browser-Mockup-4-en.png

Flat-Web-Browser-Mockup-4-en.png

1141 ms

hosteur-logo.png

hosteur-logo.png

772 ms

logo-yess.png

logo-yess.png

820 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

50 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

770 ms

Logo_Nestle.svg.png

Logo_Nestle.svg.png

929 ms

LOGO-BDuu.png

LOGO-BDuu.png

873 ms

Sans%20titre(1).png

Sans%20titre(1).png

955 ms

Sans%20titre.png

Sans%20titre.png

929 ms

Sans%20titre(2).png

Sans%20titre(2).png

1040 ms

Sans%20titre(3).png

Sans%20titre(3).png

983 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

62 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

26 ms

922142814505738

922142814505738

66 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

56 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf

glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf

472 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg

glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg

104 ms

Accessibility Review

mailstronger.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

mailstronger.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mailstronger.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailstronger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailstronger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mailstronger.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mail Stronger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: