8 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.8 sec
291 ms
Click here to check amazing Maincoat Ltd content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about maincoatltd.co.uk
Professional Commercial and Industrial Roofing Contractors based in Lytham St Annes serving the whole of North West England.
Visit maincoatltd.co.ukWe analyzed Maincoatltd.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
maincoatltd.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value3,580 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.184
66/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
1925 ms
83 ms
178 ms
239 ms
240 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Maincoatltd.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Maincoatltd.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 292.7 kB (10%)
2.9 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Maincoatltd.co.uk main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 163.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maincoat Ltd images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maincoatltd.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 95 (86%)
110
15
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maincoat Ltd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 43 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
maincoatltd.co.uk
1925 ms
js
83 ms
dashicons.min.css
178 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
239 ms
layerslider.css
240 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
animate.css
332 ms
lvca-frontend.css
266 ms
icomoon.css
277 ms
font-awesome.min.css
318 ms
styles.css
316 ms
front.min.css
356 ms
style.css
367 ms
slick.css
395 ms
style.css
396 ms
style.css
401 ms
style.css
410 ms
style.css
444 ms
style.css
456 ms
style.css
474 ms
style.css
475 ms
style.css
480 ms
style.css
489 ms
style.css
535 ms
style.css
545 ms
style.css
552 ms
flexslider.css
553 ms
style.css
560 ms
style.css
568 ms
bootstrap.min.css
626 ms
bootstrap-dropdownhover.min.css
634 ms
animate.min.css
632 ms
loader.css
631 ms
style.css
644 ms
responsive.css
651 ms
js_composer.min.css
724 ms
front.css
710 ms
css
34 ms
css
113 ms
api.js
42 ms
prettyphoto.css
578 ms
owl.carousel.css
516 ms
owl.theme.css
516 ms
owl.transitions.css
532 ms
lcs-styles.css
522 ms
jquery.min.js
512 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
504 ms
greensock.js
493 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
571 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
523 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
511 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
503 ms
lvca-frontend.min.js
534 ms
front.min.js
531 ms
accordion.min.js
547 ms
slick.min.js
514 ms
jquery.stats.min.js
527 ms
odometer.min.js
508 ms
piechart.min.js
525 ms
posts-carousel.min.js
526 ms
spacer.min.js
547 ms
services.min.js
502 ms
stats-bar.min.js
518 ms
tabs.min.js
510 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
538 ms
testimonials.min.js
536 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
548 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
485 ms
portfolio.min.js
510 ms
front.min.js
517 ms
lazysizes.min.js
610 ms
core.min.js
593 ms
mouse.min.js
592 ms
resizable.min.js
530 ms
draggable.min.js
576 ms
controlgroup.min.js
543 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
585 ms
button.min.js
544 ms
dialog.min.js
543 ms
wpdialog.min.js
540 ms
hooks.min.js
544 ms
i18n.min.js
526 ms
index.js
545 ms
index.js
512 ms
bootstrap.min.js
510 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
508 ms
bootstrap-dropdownhover.min.js
515 ms
custom.js
485 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
564 ms
index.js
514 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
540 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.custom.min.js
549 ms
justified-image-grid.min.js
528 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
529 ms
font
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
551 ms
font
46 ms
LIQUID-ROOFING-SYSTEM.jpg
1072 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
logo21.png
262 ms
pinit.js
195 ms
timthumb.php
278 ms
timthumb.php
278 ms
timthumb.php
321 ms
timthumb.php
320 ms
timthumb.php
378 ms
timthumb.php
466 ms
timthumb.php
465 ms
timthumb.php
834 ms
skin.css
334 ms
ajax-loader.gif
286 ms
icomoon.ttf
212 ms
pinit_main.js
44 ms
maincoatltd.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
maincoatltd.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
maincoatltd.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maincoatltd.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maincoatltd.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maincoatltd.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maincoat Ltd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: