1.4 sec in total
180 ms
1.1 sec
116 ms
Welcome to makeupjet.com homepage info - get ready to check Makeup Jet best content right away, or after learning these important things about makeupjet.com
Makeup Jet Magazine Numéro 1 d'inspiration Beauté, Maquillage, tendances, tests produits et plus
Visit makeupjet.comWe analyzed Makeupjet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
makeupjet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value3,610 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.886
3/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
180 ms
103 ms
122 ms
130 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Makeupjet.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to 0 and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Makeupjet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 111.8 kB (19%)
594.3 kB
482.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Makeupjet.com main page is 594.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 322.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 923 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Makeup Jet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Makeupjet.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (93%)
83
6
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Makeup Jet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
makeupjet.com
180 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
103 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
122 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
130 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
shoppable-images-front.min.css
119 ms
mashsb.min.css
57 ms
youtube.min.css
56 ms
video-playlist.min.css
70 ms
gallery.min.css
155 ms
magnific-popup.css
89 ms
snax.min.css
105 ms
snax-frontend-submission.min.css
121 ms
jquery.tagit.css
120 ms
tagit.ui-zendesk.css
132 ms
froala_editor.min.css
134 ms
froala_style.min.css
136 ms
quick_insert.min.css
136 ms
char_counter.min.css
138 ms
line_breaker.min.css
225 ms
font-awesome.min.css
229 ms
main.min.css
235 ms
wpp.css
236 ms
all-light.min.css
163 ms
css
23 ms
dynamic-style.css
69 ms
snax-extra-light.min.css
251 ms
vc-light.min.css
260 ms
mashshare-light.min.css
239 ms
jetpack.css
337 ms
jquery.min.js
249 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
251 ms
slideup.js
333 ms
shoppable-images-front.js
358 ms
coupons.js
263 ms
mashsb.min.js
264 ms
moxie.min.js
274 ms
adsbygoogle.js
144 ms
e-202409.js
23 ms
screen-basic.min.css
363 ms
snapcode.min.css
244 ms
plupload.min.js
323 ms
wpp.min.js
246 ms
modernizr-custom.min.js
247 ms
lazysizes.min.js
259 ms
youtube.js
377 ms
vimeo.min.js
261 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
360 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
351 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
347 ms
playlist.js
355 ms
gallery.js
357 ms
collections.min.js
339 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
349 ms
jquery.timeago.js
421 ms
jquery.timeago.en.js
456 ms
handlers.js
345 ms
front.js
456 ms
featured-image.js
348 ms
front.js
322 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
371 ms
stickyfill.min.js
272 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
316 ms
matchmedia.js
315 ms
matchmedia.addlistener.js
311 ms
picturefill.min.js
300 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
300 ms
libgif.js
300 ms
enquire.min.js
292 ms
core.min.js
324 ms
menu.min.js
392 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
314 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
313 ms
dom-ready.min.js
373 ms
hooks.min.js
283 ms
i18n.min.js
344 ms
a11y.min.js
262 ms
autocomplete.min.js
318 ms
front.js
314 ms
wp-embed.min.js
291 ms
footer_stamp.png
72 ms
logo-makeup-jet.png
160 ms
logo.png
90 ms
blank.png
356 ms
font
24 ms
font
117 ms
bimber.woff
286 ms
makeupjet.com
43 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
330 ms
footer_stamp-2x.png
18 ms
makeupjet.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
makeupjet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
makeupjet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Makeupjet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Makeupjet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
makeupjet.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Makeup Jet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: